Donkey skin

Anne Wiazemsky and Balthazar (click to enlarge)
He was once part of a school of dour, austere, enlightened (and woefully extinct) mavericks that included Carl Dreyer, Yasujiro Ozu and Andrei Tarkovsky—borderline manic depressives with Bresson the harshest critic of humanity. His surface techniques (close-ups of hands and feet, nonprofessional actors pivoting without expression, the free association between seemingly disparate subplots) appear simple to avoid shrouding his disapproval of sin and gluttony. His eternal underlying theme, purity is rarely so blatant as it is in Balthazar.
Burdened with carrying the vanity and transgressions of man to his last dying breath, Balthazar is a saint encased within the body of a donkey. From the beginning, when he’s anointed with baptismal water by children yet to taste the fruit of sin (for even priests are tainted), the beast serves as a metaphor for humility and suffering in a world blinded by pride, self-gratification and vanity. The decades pass, the children become deformed by avarice, and the donkey endures hardship at the hands of the frustrated souls who’ve lost touch with their spiritual core.
While fans generally choose between Diary of a Country Priest (1951) and A Man Escaped (1956) to name as Bresson’s best film, both Balthazar and Mouchette (the story of a young girl not unlike Balthazar) may emerge as his true masterworks. Both set in rural villages weathering change and modernization, they perceive deliverance as possible only through death. These are grim and troubling portraits in which basic human values are tested without regard to narrative conventions or viewer expectations. But the end surely justifies the means: the journey of Balthazar, from barnyard pet to useful farm animal; his descent in a world increasingly dependent on machines and its own morbid obsession with loss; and those final moments surrounded by the lambs of God—there is no greater gift than his lesson of compassion and tenderness. May he rest in peace.



2 Comments:
I watched Robert Bresson’s Au hasard Balthazar with my husband last night after dinner. He had prepared himself for the onslaught of emotional reactions I would have while watching it, so when I did not cry buckets he was stunned. I was surprised myself, since I’m so passionate about animals. I think the fact that he had given me a brief summary of the film earlier that day -- and the fact that I Google’d Robert Bresson to get the low-down on his films, helped me to behave.
I have a lot more experience viewing films as entertainment than as art. So I adjusted my viewing mode like I would switch from contemporary to classical on the radio.
The value of any work of art is that it is open to interpretation. Au hasard Balthazar is an exceptional work of art -- one man’s awareness of time and space and of living things. Robert Bresson separates himself from the canvas and paints it well. He is a constituent of humanity painting a portrait of humanity and of the soul as he perceives it through the eyes the meek -- a gentle and unassuming donkey named Balthazar. Things exceeding the necessary are left out and to the naked eye humanity appears vacant and cruel. But with a keen awareness of your own soul you can separate yourself from your expectations. Your are suddenly aware of your innocence dwindling through time and circumstance. In the end you’re overcome with sadness for Balthazar until that one moment when you see him delivered from evil. Bravo, Robert Bresson!
Hey Flickhead! Don`t let it be said i`m not accomodating!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home