Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Pauline at the bitch

kael1231-a

  • Over the years, several friends and acquaintances have made it quite obvious that they’ve no use for Pauline Kael. Often using “Raising Kane” as a weapon against its author, they mercilessly condemn her views and writing. On that last count the argument seems ridiculous. She’s one of the very few film critics who can hold my attention from start to finish. If it weren’t for her, I seriously doubt that I’d be writing at all: this blog entry, this blog, my website…anything. Kael showed me that personality and opinion needn’t be stifled by rules or popular opinion. As someone with aspirations of being a writer, reading her work was perhaps the most liberating and educational experience I’ve ever had.

        But those friends and acquaintances usually waffle when criticizing Kael’s art with words, and it’s soon evident that their real issue has to do with her opinions and disregard for accepted norms. Here again I believe it’s a misunderstanding on their part — though the walls are now too high and dense to change anyone’s mind.

        In any event, the thoughtful folks at If Charlie Parker were a gunslinger… are offering an mp3 that’s nearly an hour long, of Ms. Kael (circa 1963) going on about Andrew Sarris, the auteur theory, Andrew Sarris, Raoul Walsh, Andrew Sarris, Howard Hawks, Andrew Sarris, and…Andrew Sarris. Direct your attention here and fasten your seatbelt.

  • 2 Comments:

    Blogger NickySkye said...

    Thank you SO much for your thoughts about Pauline Kael and for the excellent link to the audio of her sizzlingly insightful speech.

    1:02 AM EST  
    Blogger That Little Round-Headed Boy said...

    Nice thoughts on Kael. She was like all great writers, highly opinionated and opinions don't always hold up, but nobody could approach her fizzy style and her view that film criticism must be pitiless, free of "saphead objectivity" in her great phrase. If I'm watching a movie from her prime review years, I always pull down a copy of her anthology to check her opinion of the film against mine. She wasn't perfect — and some stories seem to indicate that she had a giant ego (which is no surprise if you've spent time among professional writers) — but she was the last person to truly make cultural criticism matter. If great film criticism is ever truly to happen again, I think it might come from the myriad voices on blogs. The mainstream publications just seem to have lost the ability to produce another Pauline Kael. I always ask: Does anybody know of another Kael-in-the-making in film or any other form of cultural criticism? If so, I'd love to know...

    7:14 PM EST  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home