Tuesday, August 29, 2006

House of games

New on Flickhead:

swindle01

  • “Chabrol’s fragments of plot…levitate as a cloud moving over a veiled critique of human foibles, where love is indefinable and uncertain.” Just out on DVD from New Yorker Video, Rien ne va plus (a.k.a. The Swindle, 1997). Read the review now on Flickhead


  • A translation of Claude Chabrol’s thumbnail critiques of Robert Aldrich, John Brahm, Edward Dmytryk, Phillip Dunne, Martin Ritt, and William Wyler from the Dec63/Jan64 special “American Cinema” issue of Cahiers du Cinema at My Gleanings.

  • Saturday, August 26, 2006

    Claude Chabrol gallery, part deux

    CLAUDE%20CHABROL


    LesCousins

    Juliette Mayniel and Gérard Blain in the process of losing their innocence in Les Cousins (1959) — click to enlarge.


    Bonnesfemmes

    Stéphane Audran, Lucile Saint-Simon, Bernadette Lafont and Clotilde Joano in a posed publicity still for Les Bonnes femmes (1960) — click to enlarge.


    DoubleTourofCC

    A double tour?


    LesBiches

    Jacqueline Sassard (right) ‘enters’ Stéphane Audran in Les Biches (1968) — click to enlarge.


    Biches11

    Group hug: Stéphane Audran, Dominique Zardi and Henri Attal in Les Biches — click to enlarge.


    Biches12

    Jacqueline Sassard sheds a crocodile tear before Henri Attal (left) and Dominique Zardi in Les Biches — click to enlarge.


    Biches13

    Koncert Kalamity: Henri Attal, Dominique Zardi and Stéphane Audran in Les Biches — click to enlarge.


    160206HAN1021

    Chabrol with Isabelle Huppert


    JusteAvant

    Michel Bouquet and Stéphane Audran (perhaps at her most beautiful) in Juste avant la nuit (1971) — click to enlarge.


    PartiePlaisir

    Screenwriter Paul Gégauff and wife Danièle made a rare starring appearance in Chabrol’s Une partie de plaisir (1975) — click to enlarge. Eight years later, she stabbed him to death.


    Bride

    Benoît Magimel and Laura Smet in La Demoiselle d'honneur (2004) — click to enlarge. Laura is the daughter of Johnny Hallyday and Nathalie Baye.


    French Director Chabrol Relaxes After Film's Screening

    A recent shot of Chabrol — click to enlarge.

    Sunday, August 13, 2006

    Taking flight

    WO01

    The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill
    Review by Christine Young

  • Produced, directed, filmed and edited by Judy Irving, this documentary is a tender story of love between a man and a flock of wild parrots who have made San Francisco’s north waterfront their home.

        Homeless and searching for some kind of meaning in his life, Mark Bittner finds a no-rent situation as caretaker of a small cottage in the Telegraph Hill section of San Francisco where, outside in the gardens, he notices four parrots.

        In the beginning, Mark’s attention is on the parrots intermittently as he goes through his daily routine. His curiosity about the parrots soon becomes admiration. Admiration soon becomes love, and each new day brings another delight and another lesson about their ways. Mark’s gentle and unassuming nature is appealing, and you can see why the parrots would accept him and trust him as they do, and how natural it is for Mark to embrace them.

        This is a wonderful film that reveals the beauty of San Francisco in a personal way. The stealers of the show are definitely the parrots, and Mark’s devotion to them is inspirational. Judy Irving does well in presenting the compassionate side of human nature and the spiritual connection we have to the world and the wildlife around us. I can’t imagine anyone not liking this film.

        As a matter of fact I didn’t want it to be over, and on the strength of my enthusiasm for Mark and these delightful creatures, I couldn’t wait to read Mark’s book of the same title, The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill (Harmony Books, 2004), which Flickhead presented to me for my birthday.


  • WP002

    “It’s a Heavenly thing to be allowed to touch a bird.” — Mark Bittner (photo by Daniela Cossali; click to enlarge)

        The book is great! I particularly enjoyed the story concerning Mark’s early days in San Francisco. It’s a place I’ve never been to, and he brought it to life for me. Through his description of his youthful and aspiring days during the 70’s, he brought to my mind this period of my own youth that had somehow escaped my notice. The psychedelic quality of that time and space, along with the music of the flower children, was in my peripheral vision — occasionally admired, but not experienced in the flesh. My small hometown wasn’t really a happening place. San Francisco would have been an exceptional place for me to visit at the time. I would have fallen under its spell. Perhaps I would have stayed there.

        Mark’s story is genuine. He describes himself as a regular guy who has had some good times and some bad times. When he was a kid he wanted to be a writer. When he grew he changed his mind and put his efforts into being a musician — which is why he wound up in San Francisco, where musicians sprouted like wild flowers through cracks in the pavement.

        Later, when music didn’t pan out for him, he had no vocation, no direction in life, and no place to live. He depended on the generosity of others who would occasionally help him out. He read a lot of books and studied the Eastern philosophies that might somehow help him find what he was looking for. He lived in his friend’s beat-up van. He was evicted from the van. He slept in an alley. Police chased him from the alley. He slept on a roof. He gleaned what coins he could find on the ground and bought day old bread from an Italian bakery. He worked odd jobs for food, and at a really low point in his life had thoughts of suicide. He did not follow through but went on searching, and in due course discovered the path that lead him to his future.


    Mingusinnest

    Mingus (above) liked to stay inside with Mark, occasionally hiding and then popping out to play and poke at his feet.


        A flock of wild parrots was Mark’s saving grace; their existence in the gardens outside his door and his pleasure in observing them was a distraction from the worries about his future. He intended to bird watch, but the parrots were a pleasant surprise. Their flight and their antics — their mere existence in a part of the world they are known not to come from is a marvel. From this point on Mark cultivates a relationship that blossoms, and in doing so finds a respite from the cares that have plagued him all along.

        The film and the book compliment one another. It really doesn’t matter whether you read the book first or see the documentary, as one will lead you to the next. But my suggestion would be to read the book first. I think that knowing the story and having it all in your mind first will make watching the film even more enjoyable. The stories in the book, of course, go into more detail about Mark’s life and his feelings and about the individual parrots and their personalities. I was considerably touched by the stories of the sick or injured parrots he had brought into the house to care for, especially little Tupelo. These are the birds he really got close to.

        We are not all cut out to be seekers of fortune, but I think we are all seekers of truth — our own truth. In either quest there is the primary notion that what we are seeking will ensure our happiness. Like Mark, I grew up as a child of the 50’s, a teen of the 60’s and a young adult of the 70’s. I sought happiness and never put a dollar value on it. I thought happiness was the husband and the children I longed for, and I focused on that to the exclusion of everything else. Ironically, I didn’t marry until I was thirty-three and I have no children; so all those years I spent seeking what I thought would make me happy right then and there, could have been spent learning all the things I crave to learn now in my fifty-sixth year.

        But that is a spilt milk situation that cannot be relived and shouldn’t be cried over —besides, I have found happiness in many things that were not on my original to-do list. When you’re older you come to realize that happiness in this world — so says Nathaniel Hawthorne — “…comes incidentally. Make it the object of pursuit, and it leads us a wild-goose chase, and is never attained. Follow some other object, and very possibly we may find that we have caught happiness without dreaming of it.”

        Accordingly, Mark’s path through life brought him to where he is today. As a result of his curiosity and kindness toward the parrots he was given the privilege to hang out with them and to get to know them more intimately than he could have imagined, and that brought him unexpected happiness. He’s written a book about his experience and it’s the subject of a great documentary — can it get any better than that? I suppose it can.

        Thank you Mark for sharing your story with us. Thank you Judy Irving for showing it to us. But most of all, thanks to the wild flock of parrots for gracing our world with your presence.


    A note about the soundtrack music

  • The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill is dedicated in memory of Chris Michie, who began working with Judy Irving with the intention of writing background music for the ending credits. He soon wound up composing a delicate and emotive score for the whole film. It was Mr. Michie’s final project before he passed away on March 27, 2003. For more information, visit the Chris Michie website.


  • — Christine Young

    140008170X.01._AA_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg
  • Buy the book

    B000BB1534.01._AA_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg
  • Buy the DVD

  • Wednesday, August 09, 2006

    Out of gas, forever flatulent

    Cars1

    Bite My Exhaust Pipe:
    Pixar’s Cars


    By Nelhydrea Paupér

  • After much discussion about the STATE OF THINGS (not the Wim Wenders film but the real STATE OF THINGS) Mrs. Paupér and I have come to the following conclusion: that there are two classifications of human beings in the modern world; that these two classifications transcend race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, political philosophy and chemical preternatural tendencies; and that these two classifications can be defined in relatively simple terms. To wit:

        Group one we will call the Directionalists. These are People who, when driving a car, use their directional signal – their “blinkers” – on a regular basis whenever they make a turn, left or right. Using their blinkers is not the end-all of life, but it is an indicator of that person’s overall outlook and philosophy. They understand that others are not reading their minds, that the universe does not revolve around them alone, that they are capable of making mistakes and causing accidents. They use their directionals because they should.

        Group two is comprised of the people who rarely or never use their directionals. They are called Shitheads.

        If you do not routinely use your directional when you are driving you, dear reader, are a Shithead.

        This bit of philosophical insight, acquired over the last few years whilst living as an exile in New Jersey, reemerged recently in Daddy Paupér’s heat-stroked head after visiting the local simplex with the Wee Paupér. We went to catch some air conditioning and the most recent Pixar release, Cars. It is clearly a movie made by and for Shitheads.

        The Paupér household has thus far avoided most of the current breed of CGI animated movies. The few we’ve seen have, put simply, sucked. The smarmy, self-knowing, nudge-nudge double-entendres intended for the “grownups,” so beloved by moronic audiences just because they go over the kiddies’ heads are, frankly, unfunny and obnoxious. I’m no prude – Anal Invaders 4 is among my favorite auteurist efforts – but why not try making smart jokes for the adults instead of bottom-feeder stuff? Or at least give the bottom-feeder stuff a witty enough presentation to make it actually clever.

        Anyway, it turned out we had somehow managed to only see recent animated drivel by Disney and Dreamworks. All crap (the Wee Paupér demanded to leave Shrek 2 after 30 minutes). But we’d entirely missed Pixar. I confess I knew the name but didn’t know there was supposed to be such a big difference in quality – until a few co-workers at my former employer informed me that Pixar was different and far superior, the corporation as auteur. One fellow considered The Incredibles to be the best film of 2004 (I still haven’t seen it so I offer no opinion here).

        With that in mind I took the Wee Paupér, now 6 years old, to see Cars. This time he lasted 45 minutes. Which was about 43 more than I thought I could bear.

        It was a completely muddled barrage of noise and gyration, with fast cutting galore and lots of switching from the general movie mise-en-scene view to a TV network ESPN-type view to Christ knows what else (think Speed Racer done as an Owen Wilson comedy directed by early-90s Oliver Stone). Confusing to an adult, pointless to a kid.

        Then it steals the entire plot of the 1991 Doc Hollywood. As far as I can tell none of the 12 – I shit you not, 12 – “writers” listed in the credits for this thing have the same name as either of the 2 writers credited for that inoffensive Michael J. Fox fluff.

        At this point the Wee one mercifully started wandering around the – empty – theater, jumping on the folding chairs and shaking his head “no” when I gestured for him to sit down and watch. It was time, he was ready, we left. I’ll never know what happened to Speed McGurk, or whatever the fuck that piece of shit lead character was named.

        I must state here that the Wee Paupér sat still throughout the entire Wallace and Gromit Curse of the Wererabbit. It so happens that it was quite good, well written, genuinely funny and had hand-animation that was simple but somehow pleasing to the eye ( I know it was released by Dreamworks but they didn’t actually “make it,” Nick Park and Steve Box did). He also sat throughout the Curious George movie earlier this year. Nothing special but it was actually quite sweet and enjoyable. Also hand animated, interestingly enough.

        Now, the wee Pauper likes lots of junk, mostly old stuff on video. He’s currently on a Little Lulu kick – the 1940s ones. He’s not infallible. But the Big-Self-important Paupér is a proud papa indeed. For when it comes to new animated studio releases the kid already knows shit from shinola.

  • — Nelhydrea Paupér

    Monday, August 07, 2006

    Disaster Movies!

    DM01

  • “Discussions of American film in the 1970’s invariably gravitate toward the peak years of Coppola, Scorsese, Altman and Ashby…but for every maverick and masterpiece there were truckloads of trash…outright junk that had a lot of us keeping one eye on the clock and the other on the exit.” A review of Glenn Kay and Michael Rose’s new book, Disaster Movies, now on Flickhead.

  • Friday, August 04, 2006

    Jamming with Edwardians

    ee01

  • “Indispensable to anyone who loves the great and simple revelations of early cinema.” Nelhydrea Paupér reviews Electric Edwardians: The Lost Films of Mitchell & Kenyon, now on Flickhead.

  • Tuesday, August 01, 2006

    The Devil, probably

    Anger02
    Kenneth Anger

    Lucifer Rising
    Anger management and Bobby BeauSoleil


  • For well over a decade, the creation of Kenneth Anger’s Lucifer Rising (1970/81) became a legend of the underground, and the multiplying accounts and rumors threatened to dwarf the film itself. Footage shot in 1967 in and around California had reportedly vanished. The film’s star and soundtrack composer Bobby BeauSoleil had problems of his own: soured drug deals and an association with Charles Manson found him arrested and incarcerated before the picture was finished. Meanwhile, the utopian daydreams of ‘the Sixties’ came undone and Anger left America for Europe, saying ‘goodbye’ in a mock obituary he sent in to a newspaper. A few years later he resumed Lucifer Rising, and approached Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page to do the music. But he was unhappy with Page’s contribution and looked up BeauSoleil to compose and record the music from behind bars. In 1980, nearly fourteen years after it began production, Lucifer Rising had its opening at the Whitney Museum.
        It is a reflection of the ‘Age of Aquarius’ that was once so fashionable in the days of Hair, and Anger, living in San Francisco during 1967’s fabled Summer of Love, was inspired to make a film that would welcome ‘Lucifer, the LightGod’ to the simmering battle that was dividing generations and cultures. At the same time, his earlier movies were just beginning to work their way from museum showings to universities and revival theatres. Scorpio Rising (1963) became a cult movie and had a modest release on a double-bill paired with Robert Downey’s Chafed Elbows (1966; see the original poster art here). And perhaps most famous of all, Anger’s book Hollywood Babylon, his scathing exposé of golden-age Tinsel Town dirt, was making heads spin. After tinkering away on arcane, barely-screened experimental pictures for twenty years, Anger was now the focal point of the underground press and the unlikeliest media darling you could imagine.


  • lr001AA
    Myriam Gibril in Lucifer Rising


        It’s tempting to assume Lucifer Rising was a reaction to the times and his critics. He had certainly never made anything as epic before (or since), filming in exotic lands — Karnak, Luxor, Avebury, and Stonehenge — using tones and textures to blend primitive and contemporary images, building his way to a futuristic crescendo in which a coral-colored UFO hovers above ancient Egypt. Sedate and painterly if compared to the pace and character of most of his 60’s films, Lucifer Rising appears as a heartfelt, reverent celebration of creation and the act of worship. The less erudite (re: this viewer) may have to fall back on crib notes to distinguish the film’s characters and functions. We’re told that the scenario traces “the ascension of Lucifer (Horus), Bringer of Light, invoked by Isis, Osiris, Lucifer’s Adept, Lilith and the Magus.” (For further explanation, click here.) Color me mundane. To these eyes, Anger’s flat-out showmanship has never been more striking.
        Music has always been an integral part of his films, from Vivaldi in Eaux d’artifice (1953) to the perpetual juke box of Scorpio Rising and Mick Jagger’s pulsating electronic cacophony underlining Invocation of My Demon Brother (1969). He has gambled with blatant disparity to separate aural from visual — an extreme case was Andy Arthur’s shrill 70’s pop tune juxtaposed with the classic beauty of Rabbit’s Moon (1950/79) — and believes that these films cast spells. Most all of the music was culled from preexisting tracks, methodically selected and deliberately unsettling.
        Commissioning an original score for Lucifer Rising was a smart decision. His colorful introduction to Bobby BeauSoleil, running up to the musician after a show proclaiming “You are Lucifer!” is detailed in an account written by Michael Moynihan for an attractive, informative booklet included with the new, 2-CD Lucifer Rising soundtrack. Other than capturing the mood(swings) and sense of abandon prevailing in and around the Haight/Ashbury during the late-60’s, when the young musician was in the Bay Area bands The Orkustra and The Magick Powerhouse of Oz, Moynihan has a clear appreciation of his music. (You can read portions of their extensive interview sessions online.)
        Composed and recorded in prison between 1977 and 1979, BeauSoleil worked in a makeshift studio on bare bones equipment with an ensemble of fellow inmates. Collectors have circulated bootlegs of the sessions for years, copied from the limited vinyl pressing BeauSoleil once made for family and friends. But this new edition — authorized by BeauSoleil and Anger — has been cleaned up and digitally mastered. Tight budgets and antiquated technology notwithstanding, the music now has the breadth of a major studio recording. All things considered, this could be the most important soundtrack release of the year.


    lr002AA
    Donald Cammell in Lucifer Rising


        The complete soundtrack runs nearly forty minutes on one disc, and the second CD serves up stages of its evolution. Tapes thought to be lost (or nonexistent) were tracked down, including two unexpectedly clear instrumentals by The Orkustra. There’s also a 1967 session of the Magick Powerhouse of Oz doing an embryonic Lucifer Rising that shows the influence of jazz fusion, and rehearsal tapes of the Freedom Orchestra recorded ten years later, that occasionally drift into vibrant solo improvisations.
        Performed on mostly electric instruments by non-professionals, the music has a palpable organic texture and is rooted in the blues. The film could ask for no better accompaniment, and it’s nearly impossible to imagine Anger’s vision working as well as it does without this sound. “It not only perfectly suits the mood of Anger’s film,” wrote Michael Moynihan, “but even seems to have been scored precisely to coincide with certain visual images that occur onscreen.” This is either good fortune or symmetry with the gods, because there wasn’t a finished print of the film to work off of. BeauSoleil had to rely on description and a partial slash print. He supplies a few buoyant passages that invite movie Mickey Mousing (such as the playful “Part IV”), but the rejection here of Hollywood cliché is a given. (In the film, this piece accompanies Marianne Faithfull’s ascension of Star Mountain.) Offsetting the electronic foundation, a lone trumpet is used in moderation adding an underlying sense of melancholy — and brought to mind Ennio Morricone’s work of the 60’s. Most of the score revolves around a predominant riff, an infectious cascading chord progression that has the cyclical flow of an acid trip churning toward its peak.
        It may be nostalgia for some (it all bears a superficial resemblance to the late 60’s Pink Floyd of A Saucerful of Secrets), but these ears found the twenty-five-year-old music vital and alive . . . and prompted the question, whatever became of BeauSoleil? An interesting man with an interesting story, he continues to compose and record, and has managed to build something of a small recording career from prison. The samples of his work that can be heard for free online sound like mini-scores for films yet to be made, and are on a par with, if not superior to, most of the material now written for the movies.


    B00022W4R8.01._AA_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg

    Lucifer Rising — The original soundtrack recording. Music by Bobby BeauSoleil & the Freedom Orchestra. Bobby BeauSoleil (electric guitar, bass), Richard Sutton (electric keyboard, Fender-Rhodes piano), Steve Grogan (electric guitar), Chuck Gordon (bass), Randall Chalton (drums), Andy Thurston (drums), Tim Wills (Fender-Rhodes piano), Herbie Rascone (trumpet), Robert Gadbury (“sparks”). A two-disc set with booklet. More information from White Dog Music.

    Buy from Amazon



    Text Copyright © by Ray Young

    Rabbit's tune

    rabbit


    “What impressed me about Rabbit’s Moon wasn’t the film itself — a seven-minute, black-and-white affair in which three clowns prance around in a moon-lit forest. No, what really caught my attention was the soundtrack — a demonic laugh kicked off a jaunty, organ-driven Beatlesque song that sounded like some half-forgotten top forty hit from the glam-rock era.” The search for the song and its elusive composer! Read the Flickhead article by Michael I. Cohen.


  • It Came in the Night
    By A Raincoat (mp3)