Friday, August 31, 2007

Inroads to Inland #1: Zabriskie point

IE1

  • Something should be said about David Lynch’s Inland Empire, no? A film not easily understood, it defies any hasty analysis. Imagine the quandary faced by the reviewer handing out star ratings: how many to award this esoteric vision?

    I’d like to take issue with the people who call Lynch’s work ‘surreal.’ Surrealists abhor sentiment and sentimentality; I suspect Mr. Lynch is a deeply sentimental man. Sentimentality is dripping from nearly everything he’s done: the longing for family (Eraserhead), unconditional love (Wild at Heart), acceptance (Mulholland Dr.). If we’ve got to toss labels around, I think he belongs somewhere in Symbolism or Expressionism.

    Since I’m incapable of writing a review (there’s too much going on in the movie), an informal (and probably half-baked) series of Inland Empire posts may be the best bet. For starters, let’s go to the beginning of the film. The actress having coffee with Laura Dern is Grace Zabriskie (above). She played Laura Palmer’s haunted mom in Twin Peaks and hobbled around on club foot and cane in Wild at Heart ("Fuck me, Reggie!"). I think it’s interesting that Inland’s labyrinthine plot kicks off from Zabriskie’s point, when she motions to Dern to look across the room.
  • Labels: ,

    8 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    laura dern's performance in this movie is JAW-DROPPINGLY GOOD. she should have been nominated.

    8:01 PM EST  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    The whole Goddamn thing dropped my jaw -- in fact -- blew it clean off -- and left it hanging from the rafters of an abandoned building in Łódź.

    Killer, diller.

    CHAS

    2:40 PM EST  
    Blogger Mango said...

    I'm not sure how symbolic Lynch is... although he definitely swims in symbols. I don't know how exressionistic Lynch is... although his camera is certainly expressive. I think the best category you can put him in is: Perverse.

    I can't imagine anyone's jaw dropping during IE, however. Why are you saying that (user above me)? Care to elaborate? It's simply a perversity of logic, and fairly derivative at that. It looks awful (cheap digital), sounds awful (tried to sleep while watching it in the theater, sounds kept me awake), and is horribly loooooong. Dern acted well? WHAT are you comparing her performance to? What levels are you judging her on? That has to be the worst statement I've read today.

    The acting in IE is, as always, stupid Lynch acting. Good or bad? No such definition exists. It is purely Lynch, so call it Lynchian. Don't even try to say it's better or worse than any other film. That's a dumb thing to do...

    4:43 PM EST  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Mango I'm afraid there isn't much 'elaboration' to do for you. You've decided Lynch's work is glibly dismissable as 'perverse' and all the acting 'stupid'. You were kept awake in the theatre by this? Poor baby. Next time avoid the film entirely and stay home. Your narrow understanding of film should stay just as it is, forever. We won't miss you out here.

    5:42 AM EST  
    Anonymous filmbo said...

    I agree, surrealism isn't correct at all? How about Op-Art? How scenes and actors connect to each other seem to operate from the same set of rules that that order an M.C. Escher sketch. Isn't there one where you see an Elephant with four legs, but then as your eyes move down the picture two things happen: the negative space in between the legs become the legs and the legs slowly become the space in between. That may not be the best example, but while there is a narrative and much sentiment in Inland Empire, the film is about the logic and playful illusions. Maybe Cubism is another word to describe (and then later to reject) Lynch's style.

    10:18 AM EST  
    Blogger Mango said...

    Lynch a cubist? I hope you don't mind if I utterly disagree with that. Cubism in film would have little to do with symbolism, and Lynch is heavily symbolic (or is he?). It's best to not try and put him in any categories. Just call him Lynch.

    To anonymous: I don't know where 'out here' is, but if everyone out there is as obnoxious as you, I'm pretty sure I don't want to be there. And I definitely did not dismiss Lynch based on being 'perverse' and with 'stupid acting.' If anything, those things are a positive for Lynch (did you read what I wrote?). I was just hoping someone would elaborate on horribly vague praises, but if nobody will elaborate I guess I'll just be forced to admit that I can't trust a Lynch fan to say anything of worth.

    12:50 PM EST  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Mango -
    Stay in school. One day you might learn something about (1) The World beyond your navel; and (2) film.

    Until then, Lynch films are just not for you. Stay asleep in your theatre.

    6:31 PM EST  
    Blogger Mango said...

    OK. School it is! In fact, I like it here enough to remain ignorant of both mysteries you speak of.

    8:45 PM EST  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home