That seems like a strange comparison, considering that Duchamp's Nude was intended to capture in a static image something of the quality of a figure in motion. So, really, any movie of a woman descending a staircase should be at least slightly reminiscent of the Duchamp painting in some way.
Moreover, the painting and the film have entirely opposite treatments of time in relation to motion -- film spreads out time across subsequent frames, while the most inventive aspect of the Duchamp painting is the way it condenses a longer period of time into a single "frame," showing the woman at different times in her descent all in one image. It's very difficult for film to achieve the same effect, although time-elapse photography has a hint of that approach to it. Probably the closest I've ever seen would be something like Zbigniew Rybczynski's Tango or Kurt Kren's Asly, both of which condense long times into a single image.
It sounded like a reach when Ward said it on the commentary -- my initial reaction was similar to what you say: any shot of a woman descending the stairs could be interpreted the same way. For what it's worth, the whole commentary had a few more such "observations" that were good for a chuckle.
I still kick myself for not sticking around when Jan Sterling visited my place of employment in 1972 (camera counter at a department store), promoting the fancy new SX-70 camera for Polaroid. At the time, my boss could barely contain his excitement, while I blankly asked, "Jan who?"
3 Comments:
That seems like a strange comparison, considering that Duchamp's Nude was intended to capture in a static image something of the quality of a figure in motion. So, really, any movie of a woman descending a staircase should be at least slightly reminiscent of the Duchamp painting in some way.
Moreover, the painting and the film have entirely opposite treatments of time in relation to motion -- film spreads out time across subsequent frames, while the most inventive aspect of the Duchamp painting is the way it condenses a longer period of time into a single "frame," showing the woman at different times in her descent all in one image. It's very difficult for film to achieve the same effect, although time-elapse photography has a hint of that approach to it. Probably the closest I've ever seen would be something like Zbigniew Rybczynski's Tango or Kurt Kren's Asly, both of which condense long times into a single image.
It sounded like a reach when Ward said it on the commentary -- my initial reaction was similar to what you say: any shot of a woman descending the stairs could be interpreted the same way. For what it's worth, the whole commentary had a few more such "observations" that were good for a chuckle.
I still kick myself for not sticking around when Jan Sterling visited my place of employment in 1972 (camera counter at a department store), promoting the fancy new SX-70 camera for Polaroid. At the time, my boss could barely contain his excitement, while I blankly asked, "Jan who?"
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home