Sunday, March 22, 2009

The sting

dup1

  • Once a risky gimmick (re: Slaughterhouse Five, The Man Who Fell to Earth), time tripping has evolved into an unfortunate cliché among filmmakers wary of their own material. It must be quite daunting, imagining your scenario could easily fall to boredom in linear terms, causing you to map out elaborate schemes to bounce viewers not only from now to then, but also to alternating periods within that ‘then.’ Unless there’s a hefty payoff at the end of the jumbled journey, some of us may want our money back.
        Duplicity (2009) was written and directed by Tony Gilroy, his second film as director after the impressive Michael Clayton (2007), which had its share of time tripping. There was also a nasty edge to that film, a cynicism about business and lawyers and lies. Duplicity is about those things too, but now in a sting-like setup with the soft center of a romantic entanglement. That’s between Julia Roberts and Clive Owen, both yearning to be cute. He’s too James Bond, and she’s grown somewhat matronly… and therein lies one of many problems.
        You may get a headache keeping up with the shifts — at one point there’s a flashback ala The Exterminating Angel, but the momentary reiteration (a repeated exchange between Owens and Roberts) seems less a nod to surrealism than simply a sloppy gaffe. At which point Gilroy would step in and ask, “or is it?” By that time, there may not be patience enough to entertain the question.



  • Here’s a novel idea targeted at post-9-11 urban paranoia: city gangs disguised in masks descend on subway cars and terrorize commuters with intricately choreographed hip hop dance routines. During its first fifteen minutes, Step Up 2: The Streets (2008) threatens to breathe welcome, long-overdue life into a dormant branch of the musical, with muscle and verve and passion. Then, as if frightened of its own potential, the scenario (by Toni Ann Johnson and Karen Barna, directed by Jon Chu) detours into familiar Fame territory, losing itself in weak characters and rigged situations, blundering on with way too little dance, even less music and far too much soap opera. There’s the contrived showstopping finale, ruinously shot in the rain, grossly distracting and an insult to a group of fine, attractive dancers. This film should be remade — sooner than later — by filmmakers who’ve got flow… sk1llz… game… whatever.

  • Labels:

    6 Comments:

    Blogger Ed Howard said...

    Agreed on Duplicity. It comes alive a little bit towards the end -- like that really funny scene where Owen's employers enjoy playing back the recording of him and Roberts -- but by that point I'd long since ceased to care. It's desperately striving for, yes, cute, and for the humorous banter of screwball comedies, but falling way short in both cases. It's a shame, I thought Michael Clayton was a really solid, intelligent legal thriller, but this one was just dull.

    8:47 PM EST  
    Blogger Greg F. said...

    As for non-linear I can never tell if the filmmaker is simply trying to achieve the Kane Effect, telling a story in non-linear fashion so that important aspects of character can be revealed in a certain order regardless of timeline, ala Citizen Kane, or if they are nervous, as you say here, that the story will be a yawner if told in normal linear form. I personally think Pulp Fiction used time tripping as a way to cover up a meager story and surface drawn characters, and yet I still liked it. Had it been told "in order" I probably wouldn't have.

    7:50 AM EST  
    Blogger Ed Howard said...

    A lot of people seem to say that about Pulp Fiction and I don't get why. To me, the time-shuffled narrative was used as a way of underlining the film's themes and enhancing the emotional impact of certain scenes. The way the narrative is arranged gives deeper resonance to the ultimate fates of Vincent and Jules, particularly in the final diner scene. By placing that scene last, it emphasizes that Vincent is being offered a choice, a path towards a better life, and that by choosing to remain in this life of violence and crime, he's sealing his own fate. We know that because he brushes off Jules, he'll later die; if that scene had appeared chronologically, somewhere in the middle of the film, it wouldn't have nearly the same impact or the same poignant undercurrents. That's just one example of the way the jumbled structure is used in that film for more than just superficial effects.

    8:27 AM EST  
    Blogger Flickhead said...

    Ed, I'm with you: Duplicity began to pick up where it was about to leave off. And I think Julia was miscast -- it needed someone closer to Annette Benning re: Grifters mode.

    Greg, there have been far too many non-linear films in the past fifteen years that their unpredictability has become predictable. Agreed on Kane, for it enhances the character. I've seen Pulp Fiction twice, but the only thing I remember from it is that I loathed all of it. Especially QT's insistence that every character share a similar hair-trigger personality, with the gnawing exception of his transparent "art film" moment with the French woman talking about wanting a "little pot belly." From that point on, I've always wished QT would slide head-first into a meat grinder.

    Put Gaspar Noe's Irreversible in linear order and all you have is an impotent portrait of a woman brutally ravaged for no other reason than the viewer's sick desire to wallow in it.

    8:28 AM EST  
    Blogger Greg F. said...

    Ed, I understand what you're saying, I think. I believe you're arguing that Pulp Fiction uses non-linear for character development and theme enhancement like Kane but I don't see that the characters or themes or well enough drawn for that to make a difference.

    Unlike Ray, I didn't hate it, but as I said in my original comment the characters and story seem pretty thin to me so I perceive the time-shifting to be a kind of cover-up. That's just my perception of it. It's a feeling more than a "hard proof" kind of argument for me.

    1:08 PM EST  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I'd pay admission to watch QT slide head-first into a meat grinder.

    5:38 PM EST  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home