Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Wash & wax

CAR5
Nadine Labaki (click to enlarge)

  • Among my cable’s free movies on demand this month, Caramel (Sukkar banat, 2007) threatens to become one of those pictures I end up watching over and over and over. It’s not that it’s extraordinary in any way, but there’s an ease about it, along with its gentle eroticism, that I find very appealing. And it’s filled with women. What can I tell you? I find women more interesting than men. You’ll always find me in the kitchen at parties.

        Most of it takes place in a beauty salon run by Layale, played by the remarkable Nadine Labaki, who also directed. This is her first film as director, and she may have been inspired by Tonie Marshall’s Vénus beauté (institut) (1999), which is another movie I’ve seen perhaps more times than I should. Labaki’s film can be viewed as a portrait of young Lebanese women slipping away from certain traditions while holding on to others. Marshall’s film seemed to me more about age — Nathalie Baye as an older beautician than her coworkers; Mathilde Seigner stuck in adolescent impulse; and twenty-two-year-old Audrey Tautou finding an eager sugar daddy in seventy-two-year-old Robert Hossein. (There’s a terrific sex scene between those two.)

        In Caramel, the scenario, co-written by Labaki, Rodney El Haddad and Jihad Hojeily, follows Layale’s disastrous relationship with a married man and her chilly encounters with his wife (Fadia Stella); the younger Nisrine (Yasmine Elmasri), soon to be married; Jamale (Gisèle Aouad), desperate to hold on to youth; and, in my favorite part, Rima (Joanna Moukarzel) and her quiet hair washing sessions with Siham (Fatmeh Safa and her yards and yards of silky black hair). The caramel of the title? It’s used for waxing, and I’m sure there’s a metaphor in there that’ll hit me at two in the morning. For the moment, however, I’ll gladly make due with the sensuality of this delicate film.


  • Labels: , ,

    Sartre day matinee

    AFFICHE JCVD DEF 05

  • Wednesday’s my day off and I try to devote the morning to writing. But today was different because of circumstances apparently beyond my control, one of which being a twenty-two-year-old nephew asking Mrs. Flickhead to help him punch up his job resume. He emailed it in an attachment our brand new, state of the art pc is unable to open, prompting me to ask, “why didn’t he just cut and paste it in the email instead of the attachment?” which brought me a blank stare. I believe they’re called Thousand Yard Stares, the kind used to deflect people. You see them used in movies and on TV these days, but you never really saw them prior to ten or fifteen years ago.

        Prefacing this faulty attachment was the following missive from said nephew, who hopes to land a well-paying position. The ‘Chris’ he refers to is my wife:

        Hey ant chris mom said i should email you my resume cuz your good with stuff like that. I really appricaite it, feel free to change it how ever you see fit. If i get a job thats pays me millions cuz of this i promis ill take care of ya...
    Love Ya!!! -KYLE


        Trust me, I didn’t doctor that pile of shit. That’s verbatim, buddy. At which point we should address my increasing use of profanity. I realize I should be more creative but, quite frankly, I don’t give a rat’s ass right now. As for Kyle’s message, there are those educated Liberal types who’d say he’s functionally illiterate. Me? I say he’s a Fucking Asshole. And this twenty-two-year-old Fucking Asshole who cannot spell nor construct a sentence stands to earn almost as much if not more in his coming year of employment as I did in my last year of proper employment (I’m now semi-retired) after I put some thirty years on the job. In a perfect world, this would mean I should be pulling down at least a million a year if things were based on decency and wits and other noble things like that, but since the world is run by Fucking Assholes, I don’t stand a chance.

        And though I should be working on my upcoming critique of Henry Jaglom’s Someone to Love for the film club, that email and my inability to open his file has caused me undue distress to where I’m close to smashing dishes. This is the working definition of a man at the end of his tether, a man not unlike Jean-Claude Van Damme.

        Nice segue, huh? (Note to Kyle: that ten-dollar word you just went by and don’t care about is pronounced ‘seg-way.’) I’m no authority on The Muscles from Brussels, having only seen a handful of his action pictures, all of which I found rather dull: Cyborg (1989), Double Impact (1991), Universal Soldier (1992) and Hard Target (1993). That last one was the first American movie by John Woo, a director whose craft and style elude me. I once asked a hardcore Woo fan if he could illustrate or explain Woo’s auteuristic values, and he gave me some cockamamie spiel about the recurring vision of doves flying about in Woo’s films. “What do they signify?” I asked. At which point I was met with one of those Thousand Yard Stares I talked about earlier.

        Jean-Claude’s heyday was almost fifteen years ago, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of his recent movies went straight to cable or video. The action genre, or rather the audience for it, has changed to where Jean-Claude may be considered something of an old fogey, tediously Old Skool. But now we have JCVD (2008), an odd endeavor in, well, I’m not sure just what this is. As I left in my note to one of my Netflix friends: “JCVD? WTF?!?”

        (Has anyone yet written about the contemporary trend in acronyms? Favored chiefly among illiterates and unfortunates suffering from abbreviated attention spans, or ADD, or ADHD in severe cases, I’d like to pin the blame on the knuckle-dragging Bush years and Fox News, but I believe it dates back to Clinton. While I was no fan of Reagan, at least he was colorful enough to call the Strategic Defense Initiative 'Star Wars' and not SDI. In the last dozen years, drug ads for alleged dysfunctions and syndromes have fed us a litany of new acronyms; does the medical community recognize any of them? Now that the practice has crossed over to movie titles, when will we do away with acronyms and simply grunt?)

        Jean-Claude plays himself in Brussels, caught in a hostage crisis situation at a post office. He’s mistaken for one of the bad guys, inviting a media blitz. This follows an intriguing opening scene of Jean-Claude playing himself playing a character in one of his action movies, blowing stuff up and beating the tar out of the fictional bad guys. This is followed by lighthearted digs at John Woo and Steven Seagal. At which point we’re back at the post office. I’ll give him this much: he’s forty-eight and looks terrific. And he has a sense of humor that could flourish under the tutelage of a Wilder or even Blake Edwards.

        The star-as-self gimmick makes very little sense, until we come to an abrupt stop in the action and Jean-Claude’s head floats upward. He delivers a soliloquy straight at the camera, exposing himself in Raw Emotion, the tribulations of being Jean-Claude, of raising a family, of Being There for his loved ones. This is Existential Van Damme, letting us know he’s human (had anyone asked?), revealing his vulnerability, informing the world he’s ready for… Ibsen?

        At which point I ask myself: in a world where karate meets Camus, where Kyle can make a hefty wage having tomato soup for brains, where oh where does this leave me? I’ll tell you where: I’m still staring at this blank screen where my Henry Jaglom critique should’ve already been taking form. Perhaps it’s time to get cracking.


    Available from Amazon

  • Labels: , ,

    Sunday, April 26, 2009

    Marisa Tomei is God

    W1

  • If Charlie Watts adopted a kitten, would it then be Watts’ new pussycat?

        After reading my last post in all its run-on splendor, a friend said, and not without a small amount of sarcasm, “Paragraphs? Who needs paragraphs? Chuck ‘em!” What can I say? It’s 2009 and this is the internet. Bloggers don’t ‘do’ paragraphs, now do they? It’s so much blah-blah-blah babble void of editorial know-how. Let us mourn the paragraph.

        Along with alphabetizing. I wonder how this became a lost art. Most alphabetized lists of names or titles on the internet begin with the first letter of the first name or word. With names this is nothing short of horrendous. Want Humphrey Bogart? Look him up under H, not B. With titles, it’s not horrendous but downright stupid. Want The Right Stuff (1983)? Don’t look under R. (And you should look for it if you’ve never seen it — it’s been years since I last saw it, but I recall that Phil Kaufman did a splendid job on a Tom Wolfe book that failed to hold my interest.) Some lists have it under T for ‘The’ — which becomes incredibly daunting once you realize just how many movie titles begin with The. If you think there’s nothing wrong with this practice, you’re an idiot. There’s really no point in going beyond that.

        This hit home when I glanced over the list of movies on demand on my cable. Wanting to see The Wrestler (2008) in HD, I had to click down the menu until I got to the Ts and the The’s. Buying movies on demand requires finesse with the remote. In the beginning I found a stash of porno movies on demand and, slightly excited, I kept pressing the ‘enter’ button instead of the arrow-down button, and inadvertently ordered a very cheesy girl-on-girl opus whose title escapes me now, for fifteen bucks. All I saw were two girls, rather ungainly to my eyes, going down on one another on videotape, shot by someone with a shaky hand on a Wal-mart camcorder. Because I watched only fifteen or twenty seconds, Comcast waived the fifteen dollar fee and I haven’t braved the porno section since.

        Which has nothing to do with The Wrestler, which is a very good film despite plot contrivances that could undoubtedly be traced back to Warner Bros. melodramas of the 1930s. Perhaps I bring up the art of writing, editing, alphabetizing and the proper use of TV remotes to offer some credit to Robert Siegel, who wrote the film. We’ve grown accustomed to bestowing The Director with all credit or criticism, that the writer is almost always left in the dust. Suffice it to say, no matter how many rewrites director Darren Aronofsky did on The Wrestler — and I don’t know whether he did any or not — it still needed the germ of Siegel’s story at its center. And the focus on pro wrestling is inspired, for the sport/entertainment has remained an anomaly for decades. To use it as a background in a portrait of one man’s burnout must’ve seemed dicey at first, but in the finished work you can’t imagine Mickey Rourke’s Randy The Ram in any other milieu.

        I haven’t seen a film so expert in burnout since John Huston’s Fat City (1972), and I’m not mentioning that great picture here because it was about boxing, the more legitimate cousin of pro wrestling. I mention it here because Randy The Ram had me thinking back on Stacy Keach’s Tully, who was a far more tragic figure than The Ram because he lost his mind from booze and too many punches to the head. Randy’s problems are more physical and financial, and he’s not the alcoholic Tully was. But both characters have no tangible connection to the workaday world. They live for the moments of glory provided in The Ring. They’re born entertainers with no retirement plan, no savings, no family.

        Rourke was honored for his performance, but when he failed to get the Oscar many of us were stunned after so much build-up. With his beefy physique, skin damaged from the tanning bed and long dyed hair, he had me imagining Maria Bello after a botched sex change operation. Marisa Tomei was nominated (and lost) for her role as the lap dancer The Ram envisions a life with. There are splendid moments of them facing the onset of age in vocations favoring youth and stamina. Lately I find myself taken with Tomei. I never really thought much of her before. As far as I was concerned, she did My Cousin Vinny in 1992 and then slipped into obscurity. My wife tells me she was in a Cosby Show spin-off with Lisa Bonet, but I don’t remember it.

        Then I saw Bent Hamer’s admirable attempt at Bukowski, Factotum (2005), where Tomei played the kind of woman I grew too familiar with back in my own barfly period in the late 1970s. She did it well and looked terrific. Then she had a small part in an instantly forgettable John Travolta movie called Wild Hogs (2007) where she looked better than ever before. She blossomed at forty-three and proved it thoroughly in Lumet’s piercing Before the Devil Knows You're Dead (2007) in which 80% of her screen time is spent stone naked. Reason enough for the title of this blog post.

        Aronofsky has made an honest picture in The Wrestler, which I consider an advance over his earlier work — Pi (1998), Requiem for a Dream (2000) and The Fountain (2006). He’s discovered subtlety in the least subtle sport and entertainment. He’s unlocked the sublime qualities within Rourke, which have unfortunately remained dormant for far too long. This is a beautiful, loving story of an outsider, painfully out of touch with his estranged daughter (Evan Rachel Wood in a brief but superb performance), unable to hook up with a woman hesitant toward his advances. Its characters feel genuine and their dialog’s believable. I was so very pleased that I could find it under ‘The’ and knew how to press the correct buttons to request it through a cable device poised to drive me nuts.


    Order from Amazon

  • Labels: , ,

    Saturday, April 25, 2009

    Preoccupied



  • Scrambled brains here, fatigued from going back to *work* after my annual four-month hiatus (thanks to Netflix I didn’t do a Jack Torrence), dodging cholesterol medication by diet and running five miles three or four days a week — which helps to alleviate this nagging arthritis plaguing my lower and upper back (don’t laugh, young whippersnapper: you’ll be whining about all this shit soon enough), success in reducing the weight from 210 to 170, and looking forward to elevated temperatures and my beloved sunshine. Thankfully the job is situated outdoors, and on my off days you’ll find me sprawled out on the back deck soaking in the rays with headphones feeding the ears all manner of sonic splendor at Top Volume. I’d rather not get into the prickly issue of basal cell carcinoma — we all have our areas of denial, don’t we? I hate cold, I despise winter, and the only reason I’m not perched in some glorious Arizona desert is the Maryland in-laws and my Better Half’s need to be near them just miles away in this Wayback Machine called Pennsylvania — which James Carville accurately described as “Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with Alabama in between.” Academic types have taken issue with that, first by debunking the obvious geographic differences, then by combing through political and economic data supporting little-to-no correlation. Regardless of their pie charts and textbooks, academic types are notoriously stupid in so many ways (no streetsmarts), and as I write this, Chet, one of the local farmers, just got finished raving about last night’s dinner — dinner in these parts is served around noon — from critters he trapped on his land: burgers made from squirrel brains flavored with bits of groundhog sausage. He gloated about this while “warshing” his vee-hickle down near Drover’s Rest Farm at Lowry’s Glen. That’s where the sheep are at. Don’t be so quick to judge ol’ Chet: when the evildoers start dropping the Dubya-Em-Dees, he’ll be out in the woods rustling up breakfast while I’ll be running down the street crying that my internet connection’s kaput. Indeed, who’d you rather be holed up with in the wet-ass hour? Down at Miss Lindsay’s (that there’s our titty bar yonder over the mountain) some of the girls who work on Mondays through Thursdays (slow nights) ain’t got no teeth but plenty of stretch marks, and I’ll be damned if I haven’t started calling waitresses darlin’. As they say here and down in Alabam’, “Yee-haw!

  • Labels:

    Monday, April 20, 2009

    Today...

    serpents_egg
    Click it!

    Tuesday, April 14, 2009

    I don’t know nuthin’



  • From what I gather, Dario Argento’s Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971) was never released on VHS or DVD in North America until now. Its fans may rejoice — informed sources give the new disc from Mya Communication/Ryko high marks — but the absence of a Blu-ray edition has me wondering if they plan on getting the suckers to pony up twenty bucks now for the standard DVD and another $30 six months or a year from now for Blu-ray. Who cares? I’m no fan. I fell asleep on this in the theater thirty-odd years ago and things haven’t improved. Back then I blamed the American distributor’s cutting and dubbing (the picture was made in Italy), but this restored print reveals a mess, incoherent, amateurish and boring, with cult icon Mimsy Farmer delivering her lines through clenched teeth. There’s a humorous subplot involving star Michael Brandon’s limitations as a drummer in a terrible rock band, but Argento didn’t get the joke and turned his eye on archaic gay stereotypes instead. Fans applaud the maestro’s style here, making me wonder if I should be writing movie reviews at all.




        …Just as when I read Roger Ebert’s assertion that The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008) is “an expensive, good-looking film that is well-made by Scott Derrickson.” Expensive, yes. Good-looking? Marginally. (Gort’s now a cheesy CGI toon.) Well-made? No, I don’t get that. Not one bit. The film — a rethinking of the Edmund H. North screenplay of the 1951 picture of the same title — had me for the first twenty minutes. At that juncture it took a detour down an unadvisable alley, which led to more wrong turns. There’s really no point to this movie at all, other than to get me thinking what a gifted storyteller Robert Wise was when he directed the original. There’s a subplot about a kid with emotional problems, the same shit that made Spielberg’s remake of War of the Worlds unbearable. Since Ebert makes the big bucks, and he believes this is “well-made,” color me clueless.




        Meanwhile, I was watching the Blu-ray of Quantum of Solace (2008) and found that the picture played better at home than it did in the theatre. Among the complaints when it first came out had to do with the blinding flash-cuts and jackhammer editing. A lot of people couldn’t follow what was going on. But on HDTV, it didn’t have the same headache-inducing effect. All those cuts weren’t as intrusive as they were on the big screen. Surely directing through a monitor, director Marc Forster apparently made the movie for that size screen. Olga Kurylenko, unfortunately, didn’t look as hot as she did in the theatre. I also finagled a copy of the new Blu-ray of Never Say Never Again (1983) for $2.50 (don’t ask). The image and sound are good (though the opening notes of Legrand’s theme are wobbly), the film is still uneven (but sporadically fun, especially for $2.50), and Barbara Carrera was never better (and reason enough to see it). There are some interesting but underdeveloped ‘making-of’ bonus features that should have had more info on Kevin McClory and less banter from gilded hack Irvin Kirscher, but at that price I’m not complaining.

  • Labels: , ,

    Saturday, April 11, 2009

    Happy Easter!



    Saturday, April 04, 2009

    Decapersonae

  • Thanks to The Film Doctor for inviting me to the ‘10 Favorite Film Characters’ meme — characters who rock me even if the movie blows. It’s not definitive, but it’s all I got, subject to change on whim, and in no specific order:

    GKTCAT
    Frances Stevens
    (Grace Kelly)
    To Catch a Thief
    Forgive my predilection for wealthy, horny, beautiful, fun, impeccably dressed, educated, tan, well spoken, sophisticated young blonde women who sun themselves all day on the Riviera, offer gentlemen callers ‘a leg or a breast’ for lunch and a soft but direct “hold them” after dinner. Yes, forgive me.


    LMTWO
    Chino
    (Lee Marvin)
    The Wild One
    Chino and the Beetles made Brando’s BRMC look like a cadet revue from a Castro Street leather bar. Chino was rough, unshaven, in need of a bath, ready for cheap thrills, a few laughs, perhaps some poon if he didn’t guzzle down too many brewskies. And he could easily beat the living Christmas out of Johnny had that whiny old sheriff not put his ass in the can.


    Performance2
    Pherber
    (Anita Pallenberg)
    Performance
    Chas (James Fox) ‘interviewing’ for the basement apartment is one of the great moments of late-60s cinema. Running her long index finger along some furniture (whose orifice had it been probing just moments before he showed up?), Pherber coolly recites rental terms while unfolding her luscious legs for his and our pleasure. When last seen she was retreating into a closet, bloodied and panicked from gunfire. I’d like to think she’s in there still, along with all the other psychedelic tchotchkas at 81 Powis Square.


    SCVS
    Ugo
    (Sergio Castellitto)
    Va savoir
    I love every character in this, but given his brusque manner, low self esteem and childish fits of jealousy, Ugo is closest in spirit to your humble narrator. Highlights: Ugo chowing down at the raw nerve of a dinner party, and sweetly blowing it with the lovely ‘Do’ (Hélène de Fougerolles, above). Note to self: watch this again, immediately.


    LHT2
    Sarah Connor
    (Linda Hamilton)
    Terminator 2: Judgment Day
    Casting her as the beauty of TV’s Beauty and the Beast was a stretch — face it, she’s a bit of a bow-wow — and there’s little in the filmography of lasting value. But as Sarah in the second Terminator movie (she was a tad puffy in the first), Linda Hamilton tore into the muscular mental patient/survivalist with unexpected verve. And: love the shades.


    JMNBN
    Phillip Vandamm
    (James Mason)
    North by Northwest
    Where to begin? “Seems to me you fellows could stand a little less training from the F.B.I. and a little more from the Actor’s Studio.” Or, “With such expert playacting, you make this very room a theater.” And of course, “That wasn’t very sporting, using real bullets.” Pass the brandy and cigars…


    npwthi
    Novalee Nation
    (Natalie Portman)
    Where the Heart Is
    Purity can lapse into self-parody (or a coma), and this film has far more detractors than defenders. Me? I’d like to imagine that I’m right there with Novalee: clueless, searching, delusional, sweet, soft, out of it, determined, trusting. Given the choice to live for an extended period of time with any of the characters on this list, I’d happily go with Novalee.


    TOTGND
    Kelly
    (Timothy Olyphant)
    The Girl Next Door
    Playing the model scuzzball — believably — is no easy task, but so much of this funny, clever film transcends the norm, anyway. Kelly’s introduction, the camera panning up his unflappable white trash-hustler-dufus bod, is a sleazy stunner. “Look at me! I’m fuckin’ Garfunkel!”


    AGNOTI
    Maxine Faulk
    (Ava Gardner)
    Night of the Iguana
    I’m taken with many of Ava’s characters, I’m taken with Ava, but Maxine — middle-aged sage working a bed and breakfast in the village of the damned — beats all. Plus there’s her famous comeback to Deborah Kerr’s “I’m a spinster pushing forty”: “Aw, honey, who isn’t?!?” Actually, Ava was forty-two at the time and Deborah forty-three, but no one’s counting.


    nlggh
    Alexis Davis
    (Nancy Lee Grahn)
    General Hospital
    OK, here goes what little credibility I had left: I watch General Hospital. Religiously, every day, Monday through Friday, for approximately twenty years. You think I’m kidding? Last week Michael’s hand moved, Claudia poked pinholes in Sonny’s condoms, and Robin tore up the script for her meds (she’s in deep shit). I’m shamelessly addicted. And my favorite character is Alexis, because she’s sharp, cool, very, very funny and a knockout at fifty-four.


    Passing the meme onward, I’d love to see 10 faves apiece from Mariana at Gatochy’s Blog, Tom at If Charlie Parker…, Campaspe at Self-Styled Siren, Greg at Cinema Styles and Marilyn at Ferdy on Films.

  • Labels: , , , ,

    Wednesday, April 01, 2009

    Maurice Jarre (1924 — 2009)

    jarre

    Maurice Jarre: A Tribute to David Lean. A concert recorded in 1992 at the Barbican Centre in London, the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Maurice Jarre. DVD bonus features include Christian Lauliac’s interview with Mr. Jarre, the composer’s audio commentary, discography, biographies and filmographies. $19.97 from Milan Records.



  • As Maurice Jarre remembers it, producer Sam Spiegel and director David Lean were intrigued by his score for Serge Bourguignon’s Sundays and Cybele (1962): “Spiegel was quite perspicacious, he found the music I had written for that film interesting.” It amounted to roughly ten minutes of sound parceled out over the picture’s 110-minutes, but the situation lifted the French composer from semi-obscurity to the gilded plane of Lawrence of Arabia (1962).
        These and other recollections are part of an interview and audio commentary in Maurice Jarre: A Tribute to David Lean, a DVD and CD set of the composer’s 1992 concert with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. It’s a pleasure to watch him conduct and comment on his own work. Superbly orchestrated despite a limited rehearsal period, he plays selections from Lawrence, Dr. Zhivago (1965), Ryan’s Daughter (1970) and A Passage to India (1984), performed months after Lean’s death at eighty-three.
        Lean approached filmmaking with the precision of a novelist and the eye of a painter. That he contacted Jarre when he was relatively unknown outside of France illustrates the fastidious control Lean exerted over his work. A more seasoned composer could deflect attention away from the screen with signature motifs and orchestrations, but Jarre was open minded and willing to take direction.
        [Jarre composed his first film score in 1952, for Georges Franju’s 22-minute Hôtel des Invalides. He continued working with Franju on several pictures including Les Yeux sans visage (1960), and wrote the music for early shorts by Alain Resnais (Toute la mémoire du monde) and Jacques Demy (Le Bel indifferent). Jarre’s first English-language film was Richard Fleischer’s Crack in the Mirror (1960) starring Orson Welles.]
        “David always had a very clear idea of what he wanted from the music and where the music should come in,” recalled Jarre. “When the music is good, it’s when it conveys something you don’t observe visually…rather than underline effects, [the score should] say something that the film doesn’t say.” One Hollywood cliché he consciously avoided is euphemistically termed ‘Mickey Mousing,’ when the tempo and action are synced.
        By the time Lawrence went into production, the studios had fallen, outsourcing their wares to Europe or downscaling for television, and only workhorses like Max Steiner were hanging on to the old forms. Lawrence came after Lean’s tenure with the studios and, most importantly, his shrewd investment in Bridge on the River Kwai (1957). A blockbuster shot on location, it was budgeted at three million (flamboyant in ‘57) and grossed over $33 million (extraordinary for the time).
        Lawrence was an even bigger venture shot on foreign soil (Spain and Morocco), full of the director’s pet themes: military intervention, romantic idealism, bourgeois comfort rocked by change and revolution, uprooted characters pining for simplicity — plot elements he’d revisit throughout the rest of his career. These are the things Jarre was asked to illustrate with subtlety despite the grand scale productions. He was also instructed to avoid the expected — hence, no Indian music in A Passage to India, no Russian music in Zhivago — Lean preferring a universal sound to underline the universal humanity of his stories.
        Jarre’s success was no small accomplishment. As presented in A Tribute to David Lean, the music flows as a natural extension of the image. Saved for the concert’s finale, Lawrence of Arabia has lost none of its majesty and power, but the scores for both A Passage to India and Ryan’s Daughter — each tinged with sublime moments reminiscent of Nino Rota — now seem superior achievements. Generally overlooked and undervalued, the pictures arrived long after Lean’s brand of grandeur fell out of favor with the public. Ironically, it was Dr. Zhivago that signaled the turning point as one of the last epic hits. “Lara’s Theme,” tailored for Julie Christie’s timeless beauty, is as moving today as it was in ‘65.
        Jarre often emphasized percussion, used eight harps on Ryan’s Daughter (trimmed to two for the concert), and is among the very few to work with the Ondes Martenot. Similar to the Theremin, Jarre describes it as an “ancestor of the synthesizer… it produces sounds that are absolutely impossible to reproduce with acoustic instruments.” He offers comical asides about the balalaika players hired for Zhivago (none could read music), and Sir Adrian Boult’s abbreviated role in the recording of Lawrence thanks to the rigid conditions of the chronometer. Jarre reenacts an exhausting test with the device, wherein the orchestra is timed with the moving image and the conductor down to the second.
        Although he’s composed for several well known pictures and won numerous awards (Oscars for Lawrence, Zhivago and Passage to India), Jarre remained a somewhat low key figure. Milan Records’ DVD-CD set is a rare celebration of the man and his music that also piques interest in Lean’s films once again.





  • Available from Amazon