Friday, July 31, 2009

Pre-viewed DVDs for sale, $5.50 $5 each

  • The following are all region 1 DVDs unless noted otherwise. They’re $5.50 $5 each (unless noted otherwise), postage and handling included, which I’ll ship via USPS to anywhere in the continental U.S. only. (Sorry, no UPS or FedEx.) You can pay via PayPal (my account email is flickhead@comcast.net) or send a check made payable to Ray Young at PO Box 202, Mont Alto, PA 17237. I can reserve DVDs provided I get the money within 5 business days. All sales are final, no refunds. DVDs are in good to excellent condition. Packaging is usually in good to excellent condition, sometimes fairly good condition.

    The Aviator (Scorsese; 2 disc set)

    The Big Animal (Stuhr/Kieslowski)

    Carol’s Journey (Imanol Uribe)

    Dead Silence (2007)

    Dean Martin Double Feature (Who Was That Lady? plus How to Save a Marriage)

    Double Feature: Countess Dracula plus Vampire Lovers

    Double Feature: Moon Zero Two plus When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth

    The Fall of the House of Usher (Corman)

    Feeling Minnesota

    Fernando and Carolina (Wertmuller)

    Fiend Without a Face (Criterion: booklet autographed by Richard Gordon) $10

    For a Few Dollars More

    Ginger and Cinnamon (Daniele Luchetti)

    The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

    Happiness (Solondz)

    Hop (Dominique Standaert)

    Legong: Dance of the Virgins

    The Lost Coast

    Maurice Jarre: A Tribute to David Lean (All region; includes audio CD)

    Modesty Blaise (Losey)

    Night and Fog (Nuit et brouillard; Criterion)

    The Nymph (Wertmuller)

    Opie Gets Laid (brand new; factory sealed)

    Party (Manoel de Oliveira)

    Pi

    The Pit and the Pendulum (Corman)

    Place Vendome

    Playboy’s Asian Exotica

    Playboy’s Hot Latin Ladies

    Prehistoric Women (1966)

    The Rebirth of Cool: U2 in the Third Millennium (All region; brand new, factory sealed))

    Ringers: Lord of the Fans

    This is Nowhere (documentary)

    Time of the Wolf (Haneke)

    X the Man with the X-Ray Eyes (Corman)


  • Wednesday, July 29, 2009

    Stuck Inside the Eighties With the Jesus Blues Again



    Bob Dylan, 1978-1989: Both Ends of the Rainbow

    Review by Nelhydrea Paupér

  • At some point in the mid-1970s I remember any time I walked through midtown New York City I’d be aggressively approached by members of all sorts of spiritual, personal and religious cults, one after another: Moonies, Hare Krishnas, Scientologists, the Sullivans, Jesus Freaks, all practically grabbing me by the throat insisting I go with them to a nice place with nice people who would no doubt grab me by the throat and do all sorts of nice things to me. There were also the cults that didn’t take to the streets: the EST-holes, Primal Therapy, TM, Silva Mind Control, Guru Maharaji, Guru Rajneesh, Guru Hoodoo-Voodoo. Lordy, there were tons of ‘em. (FULL DISCLOSURE: I myself was raised in a religious cult. In the 1960s-70s it was known as the Roman Catholic Church.)

        Whatever else I was insecure about as a teenager (pretty much everything) I was secure in my belief that there was no “ANSWER,” and that no group of desperate ex-druggies or failed-suicides were going to get their pathetic paws on my independent ass. I was generally tolerant and always cool with spirituality that was personal and gentle and seeking peace. But you can’t bomb your way to peace, as Richard Nixon found out. Fire & brimstone was for losers. Most of these groups were comprised of basket-cases who had gladly allowed themselves to have their baskets rewoven by manipulative, power-hungry, Tiny-Town terrors. This would not happen to me. I was gonna go it solo. As one of my heroes wrote, “Don’t follow leaders.”

        So imagine the horror (the horror) when in late 1979 that hero, Bob Dylan, announced in no uncertain terms that he had found Jesus, that he was born again, that Christ was the only way. And not only had he gone all Jesus on me in his private life but he put out an album of songs about his newfound beliefs that were filled with… fire & brimstone. I was left muttering the ‘70s version of “I mean, like, WTF?”

        It was a real jolt at the time. It did not compute. As a Dylan lover I had to either find a way to endure this mindfuck (my cross to bear, if you will) or abandon someone who had provided me with more meat and drink than nearly any other artist I could name at that time. Despite fleeting thoughts that I might have been fooled all along I knew those meals were real and substantial. So I shrugged and shook my head and accepted that while this was someone I might no longer run out to see whenever he came to town, and I might not follow as passionately as I once did, I would continue to listen and always try to find the good. Let us pray.

        The irony is that Dylan’s Jesus period would come to almost seem like a Renaissance compared to much of what followed in the 1980s. When the proselytizing phase passed after a couple of years there were a string of albums that were all uneven, frequently unmemorable and sometimes unlistenable. Poor Bob wandered through the desert for a lot more than forty days and forty nights. Seemed like forty years (to paraphrase a terrible line in his terrible 1981 song “Lenny Bruce”). While every album had a song or two that stood up as great songwriting, the majority of songs seemed like potentially interesting ideas that were just thoughtlessly ground up and made into flabby, over-stuffed sausages. That is, they sounded like that if you could get past the horrible productions and arrangements the poor, damned songs were often given. Cringing became a common part of listening.

        Dylan writes about this miserable period in his excellent 2004 memoir, Chronicles, an intellectual autobiography in the true sense of the term as it’s less interested in events or anecdotes than a writing pilgrim’s progress. The book is laid out into three sections which detail three stages of his life as a songwriter. The book follows a revised version of the old Hollywood romantic comedy format. Instead of “Boy meets girl/Boy loses girl/Boy gets girl,” Dylan’s book is “Boy meets songwriting/Boy loses songwriting/Boy gets songwriting.” The 1980s were Bob’s “Boy loses songwriting” phase.

        The new Chrome Dreams video, Bob Dylan, 1978-1989: Both Ends of the Rainbow, spends two hours and seven minutes probing this most difficult and frustrating period of Dylan’s life and work. As part of their excellent ongoing series of documentaries covering Dylan’s entire career, this one should be the clunker of the group. Yet the intelligence and insight found within make it always fascinating. Thus far, Chrome Dreams has produced no clunkers.

        As with the earlier videos in the series, this one gives an album-by-album, tour-by-tour history and analysis of where Dylan was at in a set period. The interviews include writers who have given Dylan’s work Deep Thought throughout the decades. The viewpoints are usually solid, sometimes astute, occasionally irritating, but always knowledgeable. (Though I can’t resist giving the professional pedant Robert Christgau a C+.) It is a relief to not have to endure the useless comments of some trendy Entertainment Weekly hack whose main awareness of Dylan began with that Victoria’s Secret commercial a few years back. The guys interviewed (and, alas, it is all guys) know their onions, yet despite being fans they can be brutal in their assessments of the work.

        The best interviews, however, are those with producers, engineers and musicians who worked with Dylan during this period. These guys (again, all guys) give good talking-head and reaffirm all the stories of Dylan’s quirky recording methods, where songs are barely learned by the players as the tape begins to roll, nothing is recorded in more than one or two takes and a botched chance may be a chance lost forever because Dylan will simply move on to another song, never to return. Shot of Love producer Chuck Plotkin describes how one of Dylan’s greatest songs, “Every Grain of Sand”, was recorded with no forewarning and no vocal microphone until a quick-thinking Plotkin grabbed a mic, knelt beside the piano and held it with arm outstretched in front of Dylan for the entire six-plus minutes of the song. Dylan had never played it for the musicians before and no second take would have been attempted. One take, one chance (bless you, Chuck). It’s impossible not to wonder what songs may have been left behind because of Dylan’s restless methodology.

        The frustration of the ‘80s albums, with their occasionally great songs like “Jokerman” or “Brownsville Girl” surrounded by throw-aways or half-worked nice-tries, becomes the main focus of the story and grows a little wearying, just as the ‘80s themselves did. But the insight into the good songs, and the genuine relief when the good, outright fun of the Traveling Willburys arrives, keep things from turning into a watered-down love.

        The decade ended with Oh, Mercy, the album which began Dylan’s return to consistent quality. Though not a favorite of this writer (Daniel Lanois’s showy production noises are too often distracting and irritating), it is given it’s proper due here as the point at which Dylan re-emerges from the dead. (In fact, Oh, Mercy is the focus of the boy-gets-songwriting-back-again final chapter of Chronicles.) So the 1980s, which began with Dylan & Jesus, ended with Dylan as Lazarus. How nifty!

        The next chapter in this saga should be a good one, with the excellent albums World Gone Wrong, Time Out of Mind and, his finest in thirty years, “Love and Theft” all just around the bend. Chrome Dreams is, without question, the best video chronicler of Dylan’s life and work thus far. If they can make Dylan’s ‘80s consistently entertaining, they can truly walk on water.


  • Available from See of Sound.

  • Labels: ,

    Tuesday, July 28, 2009

    Bill Plympton x 2

    BP1
    Above: Pooch freakout from Guide Dog (Image copyright © Bill Plympton; used with permission)

  • I don’t usually consider pullquotes as anything other than static, but the one on the cover of the Dog Days DVD cuts to the chase: “Where does Bill buy his drugs?” The line is Terry Gilliam’s, and regardless of where you stand on Gilliam, he’s got a point. Bill is animator and humorist Bill Plympton, whose people emailed me about reviewing this new disc, which leads me to believe they’ve got to be on something to be trolling for publicity here on Flickhead.

        I’m the last person you’d want critiquing your cartoons. I love 30s Max Fleischer and Warners of the 40s and 50s. (One hesitates to admit an affinity for Courageous Cat.) Beyond that, I’m lost. I’ve never made it through a classic Disney animated feature without nodding off. The television stuff of my youth (most of it Hanna-Barbera dross) failed to impress beyond the sixth grade. Thanks to those drugs Gilliam mentions, I have seen all of René Laloux’s Fantastic Planet (the benefits of LSD) and Ralph Bakshi’s American Pop (the power of the magic eight ball). But I was so much older then; I’m younger than that now.



        As it says on the box, Dog Days is “a collection of short films 2004-2008,” including Plympton’s Dog trilogy — Guard Dog, Guide Dog and Hot Dog — a trio which took hold of me the same way those Fleischer and Warners cartoons once did. They’re dangerous and twisted, and loaded with mischievous black humor. In Guard Dog, the pet weathers a series of paranoid delusions about his owner’s demise at the hands of kamikaze squirrels and other sundry disasters. Employed to assist the blind in Guide Dog, he sends one cane-tapper into cardiac arrest and whips out a high voltage defibrillator from thin air to revive him. Plympton talks about their popularity (Guard Dog was nominated for an Oscar) in his supplementary DVD commentary, speculating on why people are attracted to this loud, crazy hound. I think it’s because he exemplifies our innocent, bumbling inner loon.

        Plympton’s simplicity is evident from the outset. The colors are warm and pastel, the illustrations direct and unembellished. He says he uses color pencils on bond paper (rest easy, traditionalists: there’s no CGI here), the visuals minimal and focused. Not that he resists experimentation: Hot Dog is deliberately sketchy for a type of modernism. But the technique is never underlined; a considerate storyteller, Plympton places the needs of the script first.

        The remainder of the DVD collection is a broad assortment of cartoons, commercials, music videos and more, with illustrations branching off into a variety of styles for scenarios of varying quality. Shuteye Hotel is noirish horror, and a confirmation of Charles Addams’s influence; Santa Claus’s affiliation with Hitler (!) is the plot of Santa: The Fascist Years, strikingly done to resemble a 1940s newsreel; narrated by Paul Giamatti, The Fan and the Flower is a bittersweet fable from a script by Dan O’Shannon, its minimalism recalling Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree; the Bakshi-esque opening credits for Madonna’s Who’s That Girl tower over the live-action feature (Plympton was one of its three animators). There’s also Art or Something Like It, a video interview that would seem to answer any questions you could possibly have about the man and his art.

    gunsclack


        Along with Dog Days, Microcinema International has released Guns of the Clackamas (1995) for the first time on DVD. A relatively obscure live action feature directed by Plympton from a screenplay co-written with P.C. Vey, it’s advertised as “Spinal Tap meets Blazing Saddles only funnier!” Those allusions seem slightly generous, if not misleading. For this mockumentary inspired by Rob Reiner’s This Is Spinal Tap and Jim McBride’s David Holzman’s Diary, Plympton tells the story of a western movie, its stars who die during production and the efforts to continue filming around the dead bodies. Sustaining this material for eighty minutes is dicey. There is an audience, however, far more capable or willing than I to suspend disbelief for the mockumentary form. (Color me clueless.) Had Guns of the Clackamas been broken down into fifteen-minute chapters as a serial, I might’ve been more responsive and felt less drained.

  • For more information visit Plymptoons.

  • Slashers, anorexics, cheerleaders and the perils of smoking



  • One is hard-pressed to come up with any scholarly opinions on recent movies seen, so capsule commentary will have to suffice. It is, after all, summer:

        I was initially drawn to the ‘new’ version of Friday the 13th (2009) through a post by Arbogast, who claimed it tasted not like shit, but like ass. Now I understand. The new film, directed by Marcus Nispel, was produced by none other than Michael Bay with Sean Cunningham (the producer and director of the 1980 original) as executive producer. It’s not a terrible movie — in fact, I stayed with it from beginning to end, which makes it an improvement on the original series. (However, I must confess a personal draw to the ludicrous Jason X, in which the lumbering killer is cryogenically frozen and thawed out five hundred years in the future on a space station run by teenage hotties.) The new movie is strictly formula dead teenager stuff, but Nispel keeps it moving and the production is polished. But, yes, it does taste like ass. Very astute, Arbogast.



        Speaking of teenagers, I found myself laughing like an idiot through most of Fired Up! (2009), or ‘FU’ for short. The premise here is two high school football players/stud muffins have ‘banged’ all the available cheerleaders, and their hunger for fresh booty takes them to cheerleader camp. From a screenplay by someone claiming to be called Freedom Jones, the movie co-stars Philip Baker Hall as a coach who’s always saying ‘shit.’ Best seen at 2am, preferably while wearing a fez.



        From a screenplay co-written by Luc Besson, Taken (2008) finds ex-CIA agent Liam Neeson called out of retirement to retrieve his daughter who’s been kidnapped, drugged and sold for sex by swarthy foreign types. The daughter is played by Maggie Grace, a talented actress who deserves better material. (I first noticed her a year or two ago among the excellent ensemble cast of the tragically overlooked Jane Austen Book Club.) I was a little shaken by Neeson’s appearance. Terrible (and fluctuating) hair dye aside, the guy — sunken, gaunt and sickly — looks positively anemic.



        Which reminds me: Helen Hunt, the lively and attractive star of As Good As It Gets and the TV show Mad About You, co-wrote, produced, directed and stars in Then She Found Me (2007). A barely released family dramady, wildly disjointed (it’s something of a train wreck; Hunt’s no filmmaker), the most disturbing scenes involve characters telling Hunt how beautiful she is. But the actress apparently has a branch of anorexia in which cigarettes substitute for food. Forty-four-years-old during filming, the lines on her graying face and emaciated body make her look at least sixty, and ill to boot. I tried watching it again with her DVD audio commentary, but Helen doesn’t address the fact she looks like she just crawled out of a concentration camp.

  • Labels: ,

    Saturday, July 25, 2009

    She tasks me

    palin01

  • I’ve always made a conscious decision to steer Flickhead away from politics, as my talent for debate is limited. That, along with my boredom over the delusional idealism broadcast on too many sites and blogs, both left and right. In this case, though, I’ll make an exception.

        A friend sent this link to Vanity Fair’s editing of Sarah Palin’s resignation speech. I love editors and their red pens. And I love Sarah. Not for her politics, family values or anything else she peddles. The MILF with an agenda simply beguiles me to no end. Click to read and cringe. (Hat tip: Puppooska.)

  • Labels: ,

    Wednesday, July 22, 2009

    PROFESSOR SEVERUS SNAPE’S SORCERER-TASTIC, MUGGALICIOUS MID-SUMMER MOVIE QUIZ

    snape_smiling

  • There in my email is a Facebook note from Dennis Cozzalio, alerting me to his new quiz. I would’ve replied on Facebook, but by the time I figure out how to access my account, Facebook will be relegated to MySpace status and all of you poor saps will be scrambling to join The Next Big Thing.

        In any event here are my answers to the quiz which originated at Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule:

    (1) Second-favorite Stanley Kubrick film.
    I’m not the world’s biggest Stanley fan, though I’ll gladly place The Shining, The Killing and Eyes Wide Shut on some kind of ‘Top’ list. For the sake of the quiz, let’s say Eyes Wide Shut. And I agree with David Thomson’s theory: Nicole Kidman should’ve played all the women in the film, a presence Tom Cruise cannot escape!

    2) Most significant/important/interesting trend in movies over the past decade, for good or evil.
    That’s interesting, Dennis: “or evil.” To borrow the blogosphere parlance: WTF?!? Do you mean for good or ill? If it’s evil, it’s gotta be anything associated with Tarantino. Or was he the decade before? I forget…

    3) Bronco Billy (Clint Eastwood) or Buffalo Bill Cody (Paul Newman)?
    Drilling holes through the bottom of the barrel, I see.

    4) Best Film of 1949.
    Boom, just like that. 1949. Nineteen-forty-frikkin’-nine. Like I’m supposed to have one sitting right here. Hold on a sec. (Flickhead retreats to the internet.) OK, how about Thieves’ Highway?

    5) Joseph Tura (Jack Benny) or Oscar Jaffe (John Barrymore)?
    Dennis, are you sure you’re not gay? (Flickhead raises both arms:) “Not that there’s anything wrong with that.”

    6) Has the hand-held shaky-cam directorial style become a visual cliché?
    It became so roughly ten minutes after it began. We’ve been wallowing in the unfortunate aftermath ever since.

    7) What was the first foreign-language film you ever saw?
    The Silence back in the late 60s when PBS TV held a week-long Bergman festival.

    8) Charlie Chan (Warner Oland) or Mr. Moto (Peter Lorre)?
    See my answer to #5.

    9) Favorite World War II drama (1950-1970).
    You’ve sidestepped some gems from Warners in the 40s with those dates, and Sam Fuller’s Big Red One came out in the 80s. Still, I have a particular fondness for Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970) because those battle scenes twirl my turban.

    10) Favorite animal movie star.
    The dog in A Boy and His Dog was pretty cool.

    11) Who or whatever is to blame, name an irresponsible moment in cinema.
    Harry Julien Fink, Rita M. Fink and Dean Riesner for the screenplay of Dirty Harry: the killer should’ve never been shown until those moments when he was at the mercy of Harry. By showing the killer at work, the screenplay legitimizes Harry’s insanity.

    12) Best Film of 1969.
    Impossible.

    13) Name the last movie you saw theatrically, and also on DVD or Blu-ray.
    In the theater it was that disappointment with Clive Owen and Julia Roberts; on DVD it was Juliette Lewis, Gina Gershon and Mickey Rourke in Picture Claire; on Blu-ray it was Then She Found Me, Helen Hunt showing the world how nicotine and cigarette smoke can ravage a once-pretty face and body.

    14) Second-favorite Robert Altman film.
    You know something, Dennis? I think Robert Altman sucks.

    15) What is your favorite independent outlet for reading about movies, either online or in print?
    Other than the occasional David Thomson book, I don’t read about movies.

    16) Who wins? Angela Mao or Meiko Kaji? (Thanks, Peter!)
    Who the fuck…? I’ll let Peter vote for me. (Thanks, Peter!)

    17) Mona Lisa Vito (Marisa Tomei) or Olive Neal (Jennifer Tilly)?
    OK, I’m sure I should know where these characters are from, but, well, shit dude, I don’t. But I’d gladly, happily, eagerly give myself to Marisa any day of the week, so she gets my vote.

    18) Favorite movie that features a carnival setting or sequence.
    This is actually a loaded subject, and I’m hard-pressed to choose just one: Carny, Nightmare Alley, Strangers on a Train… if I had a few more brain cells I’m sure I could rattle off a few more titles.

    19) Best use of high-definition video on the big screen to date.
    Beats me.

    20) Favorite movie that is equal parts genre film and a deconstruction or consideration of that same genre.
    When all else fails, say “Showgirls.”

    21) Best Film of 1979.
    Now there’s a bleak time, for me at least. Bad karma. Spooky stuff. Blackouts. UFO sightings. Please, don’t make me relive that hell!

    22) Most realistic and/or sincere depiction of small-town life in the movies.
    Barbara Loden’s Wanda is dead on the money.

    23) Best horror movie creature (non-giant division).
    Since he’s essentially a walking penis fully erect, the Creature from the Black Lagoon scores points.

    24) Second-favorite Francis Ford Coppola film.
    I’m probably the only person on earth who actually likes the third Godfather movie, and, yes, Sofia too.

    25) Name a one-off movie that could have produced a franchise you would have wanted to see.
    It’s still early, but if they could revive the organization of loom weaver assassins from Wanted, I’d go see every one of them. But Angie would have to be in them. She wants me, you know. I can tell. Brad’s just an in-between fling for her.

    26) Favorite sequence from a Brian De Palma film.
    Craig Wasson getting drunk and watching cable porn in Body Double.

    27) Favorite moment in three-strip Technicolor.
    See my answer to #5.

    28) Favorite Alan Smithee film. (Thanks, Peter!)
    A ‘favorite,’ huh?

    29) Crash Davis (Kevin Costner) or Morris Buttermaker (Walter Matthau)?
    Crash and Buttermaker? Shouldn’t you be out mowing the lawn or something?

    30) Best post-Crimes and Misdemeanors Woody Allen film.
    Time generally isn’t too kind to his films; with that in mind, I’ll go with Vicky Cristina Barcelona, a very good film which could very well degenerate and suck in fifteen or twenty years.

    31) Best Film of 1999.
    I got nothing.

    32) Favorite movie tag line.
    “He’s the dude with the plan to stick it to The Man!” (Superfly)

    33) Favorite B-movie western.
    Monte Hellman’s The Shooting.

    34) Overall, the author best served by movie adaptations of her or his work.
    Financially, it’s got to be Stephen King. As for novel-to-film transitions, I’d be curious to know, because so few novels make it to the screen intact.

    35) Susan Vance (Katharine Hepburn) or Irene Bullock (Carole Lombard)?
    You know, the older I get, the less patience I seem to have for so much of ‘Golden Age’ Hollywood. Not all of it, but a lot of it.

    36) Favorite musical cameo in a non-musical movie.
    The choreographed dance number set to Lou Christie’s “Lightening Strikes” in Strange Behavior.

    37) Bruno (the character, if you haven’t seen the movie, or the film, if you have): subversive satire or purveyor of stereotyping?
    “Subversive satire” is way too generous; “purveyor of stereotyping” way too naïve.

    38) Five film folks, living or deceased, you would love to meet. (Thanks, Rick!)
    For what purpose? If it’s to sit down and chat, I’d go with the Hollywood drunks: W.C. Fields, William Holden, John Huston, Robert Mitchum, John Barrymore. There’s sure to be some juicy stories there. If it’s to bask in the glow of their aura, I’d feed my libido: Fanny Ardant, Camilla Sparv, Ingrid Thulin, Sophia Loren, Daliah Lavi… that list could go on and on…

  • Monday, July 13, 2009

    Oh Mercy! A Bob Dylan giveaway



  • Thanks to our friends at See of Sound, we have a DVD copy of Bob Dylan: 1978-1989 — Both Ends of the Rainbow to give away.

        Here’s what they say: “This classic Dylan documentary is now available as a limited edition 2 disc set. Includes the original film, which tells the story of Bob Dylan in the late 1970s and through the 1980s, his most controversial decade. Featuring much rare archive footage of Dylan in concert and performing some of his best tracks from this era, and including exclusive interviews with producers, musicians and associates who worked with him throughout the period. Also features a second disc containing over an hour of incredible audio interviews with Dylan, during which he speaks candidly and openly about his conversion to Christianity, his feelings about the criticism he received and the enlightenment this change of faith had brought him. All at once this package is a window into the music, thoughts and life of Bob Dylan between 1978's Christian album Slow Train Coming and 1989's return to form, Oh Mercy.”

  • To enter to win, simply send us an email with your name and address (continental US only, please) before July 21, 2009. A winner will be selected at random on July 22.

  • Labels:

    Saturday, July 11, 2009

    Killshot

    killshot

  • I’m no fan of DVD audio commentaries, but I found myself wanting one to find out how John Madden, a director best known for doily-and-lace (Mrs. Brown, Shakespeare in Love, Captain Corelli’s Mandolin), wound up at the helm of this tough Elmore Leonard crime picture starring Mickey Rourke and Diane Lane. It’s called Killshot (2008), and if The Wrestler marked Rourke’s comeback as the brooding heir to Brando, then this could be seen as a welcome resurrection of his back alley noirs like Johnny Handsome, Angel Heart and Homeboy.

        Of Irish lineage, Mickey defies the PC police by playing a native American hitman nicknamed Blackbird. Taking a loose cannon stickup man under his wing (Joseph Gordon-Levitt, teetering over the top), Bird hunts down newly separated couple Lane and Thomas Jane, who can ID him to the cops when they’re not sidestepping the booby traps of their failed marriage. The screenplay adaptation by Hossein Amini remains fairly faithful to the novel, in which Leonard propelled the action through character thoughts and dialog more than description. Madden captures the tension within the feverish relationships, giving ample time to meaty secondary characters played by Hal Holbrook (quite good) and Rosario Dawson (even better).

        Killshot is about people’s mounting concerns over marriage, parenting, family, friendship, loneliness and despair. It taps into the human condition and stays mostly believable throughout. The performances are first-rate, but the overall presentation may seem depressing for viewers expecting glossy, insubstantial thrills. For this fan of both Diane Lane and Mickey Rourke, however, it delivers the goods.


    Available from Amazon

  • Labels: , ,

    Wednesday, July 08, 2009

    The Father, the Son and the holy(?) spirit of Ed Wood

    Dali_ChristofStJohnoftheCross1951
    Above: Christ of St. John of the Cross, Salvador Dali (1951)

    The current Spirit of Ed Wood Blogathon prompted me to dig out the following review I wrote in 2004:

  • “One for The Passion,” I said to the woman working the box office.

        “Whoa! Hold on to yo’ seat, honey, you gonna be in fo’ a bumpy ride!” she roared while handing me the ticket.

        Did anyone say this to the Pope before he saw The Passion of the Christ?

        It’s easy to approach this film with skepticism enough to color perception. Director Mel Gibson, he of Braveheart and The Man Without a Face, has repeatedly proven himself void of nuance and tact and subtlety. Which is to say, Mel the director is not all that different from Mel the actor. Other than his stoic drifter in The Road Warrior and his intimation of psychosis in the first (and only the first) Lethal Weapon, Gibson has stamped mediocrity across nearly every role, from Hamlet down to the abyss of Air America. His jabbering idiot in Conspiracy Theory is among the most appalling performances in recent memory.

        I was initially intrigued, however, when it was announced that The Passion would be filmed in Latin, Aramaic and Hebrew. (How many Biblical pictures, in their Israeli and Roman settings, have faltered due to faux Shakespearean dialogue spit out by corpulent Old Vic hams?) While the ancient languages are authentic, any additional attempts at ‘realism’ generate more problems than Gibson can handle… or appears to be aware of. Concerned specifically with the beating, whipping and crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, The Passion is relentlessly unforgiving.

        Somewhere in the oodles of media coverage, someone must have referred to this as ‘The Gospel According to Mad Max’ or ‘A Crucifixion on Elm Street’ or ‘Good Friday the 13th,’ all fairly accurate assessments which underline the dubious quality of Gibson’s own Christianity. He has created over two graceless hours where a story of depth and wisdom has been wrung for its most superficial and horrific elements. It is a meditation on punishment and death, unconcerned with the ramifications of ‘everlasting life,’ and works from a characterization of Christ void of holiness.

        It does not recall the celebrations of the glory of God and man as rendered by Michelangelo or da Vinci, opting instead to interpret existence as a bleak, inescapable rat’s maze worthy of Hieronymus Bosch. At times broadly overacted (Gibson could have hired those Old Vic hams after all), The Passion is unmoved by the universal integrity of its subject. Love, compassion, understanding and forgiveness — Christ’s pet themes — are reluctantly, hastily broached. Gibson awards the Sermon on the Mount and the Last Supper scant lip service, glossing over them more out of dutiful obligation than personal attraction. (He allows more screen time to a clumsy aside depicting Jesus the carpenter as an ‘average Joe’ constructing a dinner table; the only thing missing is a six-pack of Bud.) When a Roman guard realizes Jesus is praying for his persecutors, it’s not a revelation of God’s grace, but Gibson’s calculated method to make people look foolish. And the Resurrection pales in comparison to its build-up, bizarrely anti-climactic and seemingly tacked on as an afterthought.

        Gibson has the chutzpah to drag Lucifer into the fray, and you can tell it’s Lucifer because the actor looks weird and has a maggot crawling out of his nose. But any correlation between this figure and the horrors imposed upon Jesus are obscured in the bombast. Carrying hideous dwarfs around for shock value, when Satan loses the soul of Jesus to God, we’re handed a scene that looks like an outtake from The Ninth Gate. This is kitsch.

        Right-wing Christian fundamentalists assured us that The Passion isn’t anti-Semitic, but even my goyim eyes were taken aback by the selection of actors for the Jewish roles. Central casting was raided for anyone ugly and large of nose (notice how many are photographed in profile), Gibson portraying them as an annoying lot — for the Romans, for Jesus, and for us. In conjunction with the stifling conservatism draped across America during its release (the Black Hole of G.W. Bush), the film draws eerie parallels with the aggressive Passion plays that fueled the fires of 1930’s Germany.

        It takes a gifted filmmaker to create inspirational art from this inspirational subject; Pasolini did it with The Gospel According to St. Matthew, and Nick Ray in King of Kings. But Mel Gibson harbors an agenda. He doesn’t display any appreciation for philosophical beauty. His vision offers no empathy, and his presentation of Christ is woefully mundane. An unmitigated failure, The Passion sets about to crucify rather than worship. It’s a cold, troubled, ungodly film.


    Available from Amazon

  • Labels: ,

    Monday, July 06, 2009

    Sporting Wood

    nec005

    The following review is a contribution to The Spirit of Ed Wood Blogathon, running from July 6-12 at Cinema Styles:

  • There’s a fringe cult that harbors a curious reverence for Ed Wood. Whether they defend his pictures or his standing as an independent filmmaker are moot points amid the gushing adulation. Ever since that ephemeral l’age d’or of Golden Turkey awards and Worst of All Time festivals (circa 1978-82), Wood’s pictures and exploits have been analyzed, scrutinized and documented beyond reason. It’s highly probable that there’s been more written about him than on Jacques Rivette and Jean-Pierre Melville combined.

        To these supporters, the discovery of Wood’s ‘lost’ uncut version of the porn film, Necromania is a major piece of a puzzle scattered about an uncharted course of topsy-turvyism. After his flagrantly inept attempts at science fiction (Plan 9 from Outer Space) and exploitation (The Sinister Urge), the descent into smut ran in concert with the filmmaker’s inability (if not abhorrence) to abide by the system. He wrote a bunch of raunchy novels and scripts under pseudonym, and took to heavy drinking. The inebriation became infectious: in the Wood-scripted Orgy of the Dead, a mid-60’s hallucination of graveyard ghouls and chubby lap dancers, even the cast appears to be blown to the gills.

        Made in 1971, Necromania has floated around over the years in substandard video dubs, but only in the R-rated of two versions. This new DVD from Fleshbot Films offers the full-tilt X-rated affair, the Unholy Grail of Wood’s fractured oeuvre. They have, in fact, provided both films on one disc for examination. Legend has it Wood shot the two separately because his R-rated cinematographer refused to do the X-rated stuff. (Why not have the X-rated cameraman cover both?) But they’re virtually interchangeable save for some genital closeups and a few sequences in which the celluloid appears to have been merely ‘flopped’ (actors facing left in one version are facing right in the other).

        Beginning with his usual plot device of innocent characters stuck at an isolated house where weirdness transpires, Wood replaces traditional B-film situations with cheesy sex clinic material. The director may have failed at emulating and arranging rudimentary genre forms in the early pictures, but Necromania finds him at ease with the disposal of drama and dialogue for shots of ungainly naked people squirming around on beds.

        There are, of course, the Wood trademarks. The free-style stock background music casually segues from bossa nova to do-wop and Egyptian themes without purpose. When an actor hits a snag trying to get his pants on, there’s no cutaway as he starts laughing over the predicament. And a gag of ringing for room service by squeezing a dildo (a ding dong?) is funny, inventive, convenient — and abandoned prematurely because the director didn’t know how (or care) to milk it for full effect.

        Cheap sets with wall-to-wall shag carpets and shag bedspreads are overlit to neutrality, while this “tale of weird love” (so says the title card) inadvertently defends the porn industry’s contemporary trend in body waxing, weightlifting and tanning beds. Wood’s low-rent cast is a grubby congregation of excess pubic hair, flabby beige skin, butt acne, cold sores and dirty feet. It could put you off sex indefinitely.

        At the end of its merciful fifty-four minutes, Necromania’s characters are snared into a transcendental state of eternal sex — short on penetration, excruciatingly long in tongue-wagging. They’ve avoided purgatory, a kaleidoscopic dimension where doughy extras grind all over one another in a game of nude Twister. We share their relief. As the leading man humps away with a bovine witch in a casket, the women lick one another to no end, and Wood reaches his climax. It’s all consistent within the ghetto of early 70’s porn, making Necromania the most competent picture of his career.


    Order through Amazon

  • Labels:

    Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    Budd Boetticher’s ‘When in Disgrace’

    Budd1

  • In a blog post dated December 19, 2005, I wrote:

        “Despite all of his films, [Budd] Boetticher’s most memorable work is an autobiography, When In Disgrace. A fragmentary attempt to penetrate the alcoholic haze clouding a delusional man’s perception, it traces a stunted career in the bullring and ‘problems’ with authority figures in Hollywood. Amazed by his own good fortune in marrying actress Debra Paget, Boetticher sets his more fascinating accounts south of the border, from getting gored in the ass by a testy toro, to days and nights in rat-infested drunk tanks. A textbook example of self-will run riot, it surely deserves a second printing. (Copies are scarce.)”

        The first and only time I read the book was a copy borrowed from the public library, and even they had to special order it from another library system clear across the country. Used copies have been for sale online, but at prices beyond my limited resources.

        Last week I received this email from Scott Montgomery of Fallbrook Publishing:

        “We are a small publishing house and are the publishing successors for the title When in Disgrace… Our owner and Budd Boetticher were close friends for many years.

        “In going through our archives recently, I found that we have a small supply of never distributed copies of When In Disgrace in two of the most collectible editions. (The trade edition was limited to 1000 copies.)

        “These Two ‘Special’ Editions consist of:

        “1. Seven Brand New Copies (in pictorial slipcase—pristine condition). These are from the ‘deluxe first printing,’ limited to 250 copies, bound in yellow silk and SIGNED by the author on the limitation page. Memoir by the noted film director and bullfighting aficionado, primarily devoted to his long struggle to produce a documentary film about legendary matador Carlos Arruza. The paste-on slipcase illustration (identical to the jacket on the trade edition) is by Barnaby Conrad, who also wrote the Introduction. (The reverse side of the slipcase bears a full-color photograph of Boetticher, mounted, in the bullring.) Foreword by Bill Krohn. Signed by Budd Boetticher.

        “2. Three Brand New, full brown leather stamped and lettered in gilt, pictorial slipcase. Illustrated. These are Three (3) of only Fifty copies published, signed by author, Conrad and Robert Stack. With foreword by Barnaby Conrad and preface by Robert Stack. These are copies numbered 23, 39 and 49 out of 50 printed.

        “These Editions are amongst the rarest of finds in connection with Budd Boetticher.. The [books] are still in their original packaging from the printer and are pristine.

        “Might you know of a collector, or perhaps a museum that would have an interest in obtaining these collectibles, Mr. Young?”

        To which I thought, “Wow!”

        In light of the current economic downturn, Fallbrook has lowered the prices of these rare, unused volumes by fifty percent. Interested parties should contact Mr. Montgomery by email at fbkpub@aol.com, or phone him at (760) 723-6637.


    Flickhead/Ray Young received no compensation for posting this announcement, nor has any affiliation with Mr. Montgomery or Fallbrook Publishing.
  • Labels: