Above, Kate Hudson's “Cinema Italiano” number from Nine (2009). I hated Rob Marshall's film of Chicago, mostly for his new style of ‘choreography’ — non-dancers filmed from the waist-up ‘dancing’ via flash cutting. I’m surprised how many otherwise intelligent people fell for that. Nine is an improvement — not a vast improvement, but an improvement nonetheless. Marshall still doesn’t realize how much of dancing is conducted below the waist. (He could probably make a movie of Riverdance using still photographs.) Nor does he acknowledge the old school of movie choreography — dancers dancing full frame to a camera that follows them. But this kind of stupidity is rampant, like a disease — check out any TV reality program and observe meaningless images of people with stunted IQs staring pensively for the cameras, rapid cutting somehow suggesting they’re lost in thought. How profound it all must seem to the susceptible mind. Anyway, Nine has its flaws, but Penélope Cruz is always worth watching, and Nicole Kidman looks magisterial. Sophia Loren, one of my life-long icons, unfortunately appears ready for a remake of Catwomen of the Moon. As for Kate Hudson, I’ve always thought of her as hard-looking, something of a hatchet face; here, however, she’s gained a few pounds and looks fabulous. I found myself replaying her “Cinema Italiano” several times.
Yes, aside fro Cruz' performance, Hudson's musical number is my favorite part of the film. Day-Lewis, for whom I have great admiration, is flatly miscast here. He makes a make believe Fellini seems even more odiously self-absorbed. Ruins the film, frankly. But yeah, Hudson is great.
I have no use for Marshall. Chicago is a good musical and he shot it as smothered as a Revlon commercial. I'm not opposed to flash, I finally caught Inglourious Basterds and loved it. But that was in service of a crazed beating heart. Not a pile of glitter and producers and a studio embarassed they're making a musical.
4 Comments:
Yes, aside fro Cruz' performance, Hudson's musical number is my favorite part of the film. Day-Lewis, for whom I have great admiration, is flatly miscast here. He makes a make believe Fellini seems even more odiously self-absorbed. Ruins the film, frankly. But yeah, Hudson is great.
You would think that someone who began as a dancer and choreographer would know how to film dance.
If you want to see a much better, and relatively original musical about a filmmaker, check out Peter Chan's Perhaps Love.
I'll easily trade Kate Hudson for Xun Zhou.
I have no use for Marshall. Chicago is a good musical and he shot it as smothered as a Revlon commercial. I'm not opposed to flash, I finally caught Inglourious Basterds and loved it. But that was in service of a crazed beating heart. Not a pile of glitter and producers and a studio embarassed they're making a musical.
After searching for this information, I will have to say most people agree with you on this topic. But I have another opinion, see it in my blog.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home