Monday, June 20, 2011

The mercenary position

dark6

  • Best known as a master cinematographer — you can see some of his finest imagery in Michael Powell’s A Matter of Life and Death (1946), Black Narcissus (1947) and The Red Shoes (1948) — but Jack Cardiff’s career as a director is a very different kettle of fish. He made a respectable version of D.H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers (1960), a serviceable Shirley MacLaine comedy in My Geisha (1962), and worked with John Ford on Young Cassidy (1965), a biopic about playwright Sean O’Casey. Then there’s the other side of Jack Cardiff, where a proclivity for cheap dime store novels and Saturday matinees may preclude serious academic consideration: Scent of Mystery (1960), the first and only picture ever shown in Smell-O-Vision; the kitschy Viking warrior epic The Long Ships (1964), complete with Sidney Poitier in pointy, upturned genie shoes; The Liquidator (1965), a humdrum faux-Bond affair; Alain Delon wooing Marianne Faithfull with deep purple prose in Naked Under Leather (1968); and the ripe mad scientist shenanigans of The Mutations (1974).

        Falling somewhere in the middle of all this, and now available on DVD-R from Warner Archive, is Dark of the Sun (1968), wherein Cardiff takes off like Sam Fuller on steroids. Following a band of mercenaries led by Rod Taylor and Jim Brown, hired by Calvin Lockhart to retrieve a gaggle of whites under attack and millions in diamonds deep in the Congo, the picture plays like a two-fisted, barrel-chested homage to the tawdry men’s adventure magazines of the day: Stag, True Men, Argosy, etc. — a popular genre which died sometime in the 1970s with the softening of earlier definitions of masculinity.

        Based on a novel I haven’t read by Wilbur Smith, Cardiff and screenwriters Ranald MacDougall and Adrien Spies sidestep standard movie conventions. They plow through the scenario’s three-day mission with verve, pausing the action only long enough for intelligent banter about duty and honor versus whoring one’s soul in the midst of a country’s political freefall. (Taylor’s bead on the trickle-down effect of globalization corrupting the Congo’s warring factions is a progressive observation for the time.) When the action resumes, it’s often brutal and pulverizing: the rape and slaughter of innocents, fistfights fortified with machetes, chainsaws and bayonets, sweaty, rootless men driven beyond the breaking point. During two scenes in which Rod flips out on a neo-Nazi opportunist played by Peter Carsten, the actor seems moments away from having a nervous breakdown.

        There’s reason to believe the new video is missing a few scenes, notably between Taylor and Yvette Mimieux, whom he rescues along the way; promotional stills suggest a brief romantic subplot that’s not onscreen. (If you’ll recall, Yvette played Rod’s Weena in The Time Machine in 1960.) Remastered from a print and not the negative, the new DVD looks acceptable but has a slight audio fade that’s sporadically detectable. Despite these misgivings, however, any opportunity to see Dark of the Sun is well advised.

  • Update: On their Twitter page, Warners claims the DVD-R is uncut and not mastered from a print.


  • dark4

    Dark1

    Above and below, original ads and art details by Frank McCarthy; click images to enlarge

    Dark2

    dark5

    8 Comments:

    Blogger Rupert Pupkin said...

    Found you blog through a tweet by Warner Archive and am already a fan! I love DARK OF THE SUN! Very curious about the possible missing scenes you mentioned. I have an old recording of it off of TCM from last year that I may need to double check against my Warner Archive's disc. I know that both Tarantino and Joe Dante are big fans of this film.

    BTW, I added you to my blogroll at Rupert Pupkin Speaks. If you're on twitter, follow me there at @bobfreelander.

    5:01 PM EST  
    Blogger Rupert Pupkin said...

    Looks like the Warner Archive Twitter account has responded about the missing scenes. There are none and the film was apparently not mastered from a print.

    5:05 PM EST  
    Blogger Flickhead said...

    I'm not sure I buy the claim that it wasn't mastered from a print -- there's dirt and imperfections in the image, especially the opening credits.

    7:22 PM EST  
    Blogger Rupert Pupkin said...

    Yeah who knows, your claim sounds valid enough to me. I am just excited to have it on DVD. Again, love your blog!

    8:19 PM EST  
    Anonymous Warner Archive said...

    Hey- Thanks for your review of Dark of the Sun. It means a lot to us since we're trying hard to get the word out on this film's recent release. Just wanted to briefly drop you a note on some of the technical issues you address in the review.

    The majority of our remastering is done from a variety of best available sources (which are never simple "theatrical prints") - that being said, even original camera negatives can have imperfections such as dust and scratches. We remaster a film when the electronic masters we have are found to be in terrible condition -or not true 16x9 masters. So we go back to the best element we can get our hands on and re-digitize it here at the studio. What we were unable to do with this release was any restoration work - digital or photochemical - so that's why you are seeing the marks.

    As per extra content missing, we went back to the original 1968 paperwork to find that both the domestic and international versions were the same run time (100 min) and as our release.

    That doesn't mean it's impossible some other footage is floating out there, but we haven't been able to pinpoint it.

    If you do have information about footage missing from this edition, it would be very helpful to us if you could let us know. Fans have pointed to releases with missing footage before and we've been able to make a running change. (We are by no means perfect - and we know it!)

    And once again, thanks for your review! It's one of the first to come back from people who've actually seen our version, and I already sent it out over our twitter feed to try and encourage even more people to check this worthwhile film out.

    8:56 PM EST  
    Blogger Flickhead said...

    Warner folks: thank you for leaving your comment!

    If you'd like me to review more Archive titles, please email me:

    flickhead@comcast.net

    Best regards,

    Ray Young

    9:59 PM EST  
    Anonymous Peter Nellhaus said...

    You might find this post on the making of Young Cassidy of interest.

    I feel bad that we'll probably never see a film with Sean Connery and Julie Christie sharing the screen.

    12:01 AM EST  
    Blogger Flickhead said...

    In Playing by Heart, it would've been appropriate (and perhaps better casting) if Julie played the wife of Sean's character, instead of Gena Rowlands. While I do like that film, in their scenes together I can only think that Connery might have been a last minute replacement for Ben Gazzara.

    5:41 AM EST  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home