Tuesday, January 31, 2012

I Sing the Bowery Electric

71I-CGZw.jpg

On the Bowery Produced and directed by Lionel Rogosin. Written by Mark Sufrin. Edited by Carl Lerner. Cinematography by Richard Bagley. Music by Charles Mills. With Ray Salyer, Gorman Hendricks and Frank Matthews. 65 minutes; released in 1956.

  • Although it happened nearly thirty years ago, it was one of those moments that’ll stay etched in my mind forever. On his wide, beefy face topped by curly gray locks, a stream of red blotches washed over pasty white skin, while my eye was distracted by a long, silver handlebar mustache that made him look like the comedian Rip Taylor. A substance abuse counselor, he stood before a roomful of newly-recovering alcoholics, their faces a jumble of hope, desperation and cynical dejection. Eyes wide, arms flailing, his delivery was impeccable — hell, he could’ve been Rip Taylor — as he gave a verbal rundown of the fall of the drunk, their decline into ‘bumhood,’ and the road to that itchy dominion called the Bowery.

        “Where do you think bums come from?” he asked with the fervor of a tent show healer. “Do you think down in the Bowery two bums hump and make a bunch of little bums? Do you think the sidewalk just opens up and a bum grows like a weed out of the cracks? No, bums were once normal people — garage mechanics, housewives, lawyers, secretaries, doctors, bricklayers — and through a set of circumstances, all involving alcohol, they ended up in the Bowery, completely removed from the life they once knew. No one gets there because they planned to.”

        Ah, the Bowery: such a word, such a place. Or street, actually. It’s had limited exposure in the movies: George Raft played supposed Brooklyn Bridge jumper Steve Brodie in Raoul Walsh’s The Bowery (1933); there’s the Bela Lugosi horror film The Bowery at Midnight (1942); Leo Gorcey and Huntz Hall headed the Bowery Boys comedy series throughout the 1940s and 50s; while Martin Scorsese touched on the real 19th century Bowery Boys in Gangs of New York (2002). And then there’s Lionel Rogosin’s landmark On the Bowery (1956), a work in which the filmmaker undertakes a vivid portrait of what one of its inhabitants calls “the saddest and maddest street in the world,” a unique time capsule that was nominated for the Best Documentary Oscar. It’s now on Blu-ray and DVD from Milestone Films.

        Passionate film folk are prone to hyperbole, so I was not altogether surprised when someone from Milestone emailed me, “I think you’ll find watching On the Bowery in Blu-ray almost a religious experience.” Yes, there was something very odd about it, the twisted irony of seeing this picture made from the gut on Skid Row for peanuts, now ablaze on my HDTV (the disc’s image is razor sharp) viewed in a house beyond the reach and imagination of the weathered souls hobbling on the screen. Far from having a spiritual epiphany, for a moment I felt like Marie Antionette.

  • BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5702787089291792258
    Above: Lionel Rogosin (second from left) directing On the Bowery (click to enlarge)

        That rehab counselor spoke of a location which was then still linked to On the Bowery but long since has been consigned to the memory hole. Since the 1990s the area has undergone massive gentrification, the inebriated old guard (Bill Landis used to call them ‘Popeyes’) squeezed out by high rents and stroller-pushing yuppies. The last of its flop houses — sorry: transient hotels — closed over a decade ago. As Bowery Boy Slip Mahoney might’ve put it, the neighborhood has gone ‘magnamitously hoity-toity.’ While I’ve visited nearby Greenwich Village within the past ten years, the last time I walked the Bowery was probably in 1977 after a show at CBGB’s. At that time you could still see, hear and most definitely smell the environs of On the Bowery, and for this suburban lad with all his tough guy posturing, it was a very scary place indeed.

        Milestone’s Blu-ray includes a weighty documentary by Rogosin’s son, Michael, about the making of his father’s film and its sweeping impact. (Cinephiles take note: Lionel was the founder of the legendary Bleecker Street Cinema.) Bursting with information, Michael’s The Perfect Team: The Making of On the Bowery provides a lot more info than I should pass on here. Suffice it to say, it alerts us to a socially aware artist who served in World War II, observed the McCarthy witch hunts, realized the severity of the Korean War, and recognized political turmoil in South Africa; all while America, in the midst of its tremendous post-War economic boon, nonetheless had its Bowery and tenderloin districts in other cities, where men and women, diseased with poverty, alcoholism and insanity, roamed the streets in threadbare clothing, bumming change from strangers and feeding their addictions in rundown gin mills, the polar opposite of the white picket fence fantasy television was dishing out in bullshit like Ozzie and Harriet and Leave It to Beaver.

        In the disc’s interview clips, Lionel (who died in 2000) explains how he spent several months watching Bowery life and gained the trust of some of its people before taking his camera to the saloons, dilapidated hotels and the Bowery Mission. Never having made a film before, he drank with them, and managed to keep his head. Rather than shoot a straight objective representation, Rogosin took a cue from De Sica’s Bicycle Thieves (1948) and the school of Italian neorealism, balancing authenticity with scripted and improvised storylines carried out by everyday people and non-actors in key roles. Closer to home, On the Bowery also has ties to Morris Engel’s Little Fugitive (1953), which took a similar approach documenting a boy’s adventures in New York’s Coney Island. This technique flew in the face of Hollywood, which had been manufacturing glossy, misleading depictions of lower Manhattan ever since Bogart roamed the prefabricated slums of Dead End (1937).

        The cinéma vérité combination of scripted storyline (as slight as it is) with reality forms a roughhewn beauty. Interwoven with the ‘plot’ about a man’s brief stopover at the Bowery, Rogosin doesn’t flinch from the unscripted barroom arguments, drunken manipulation, the back alley distillation and consumption of Sterno, and the day-to-day that, for some, begins with being hoisted out of the gutter after a night’s sleep. The predominantly male population has, for the most part, abandoned all hope of regular employment, opting instead to hang out, waiting for someone to shake down for a drink or loose change for a night in a fleabag. Outside of being tortured in a prison camp, this must be humanity’s lowest ebb, and it fits with the nation’s uptight conservative leanings that Congresswoman Clare Boothe Luce and New York Times critic Bosley Crowther attacked On the Bowery simply for exhibiting a seamy side of America they would’ve preferred to have swept under the rug. Calling the film “a dismal exposition to be charging people money to see,” Crowther ended his review by awarding thumbs up to the Walt Disney cartoon it played with. At the very least, Bosley was dependably myopic.

        Subtitled “The Films of Lionel Rogosin, Volume 1” (volume two will presumably spotlight his 1960 feature, Come Back, Africa), the two-disc set also offers Martin Scorsese’s introduction to On the Bowery; a short newsreel about the Bowery made in 1933; a ten minute documentary, Bowery Men’s Shelter (1972) directed by Rody Streeter and Tony Ganz; Lionel Rogosin’s Good Times, Wonderful Times (1964), a potent feature-length meditation on war atrocities juxtaposed with scenes from an upper crust cocktail party, augmented by a making-of documentary by Michael Rogosin; and Lionel Rogosin’s twenty-five minute Out (1957), concerning refugees of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. It’s an exceptional introduction to his work, and a testament to the inverse beauty of On the Bowery.

  • For more information on the Blu-ray and DVD sets visit Milestone Films
  • For more information on Lionel Rogosin visit Rogosin Heritage

    Here’s the trailer:



        

  • Friday, January 13, 2012

    The H-Man revisited

    416745.jpg

  • Nearly avant-garde in spite of itself, Ishirô Honda’s The H-Man (1958) is an anomaly from Japan’s Godzilla era, a faceless, shapeless blobby monster contaminating the water supply and making people dissolve on contact. Honda segues freely from policier to gangster picture to noir (complete with a Gilda-esque chanteuse belting out the blues in a local nightclub), with moments of Sirkian melodrama, Stray Dog-ish location vérité to far-from conventional monster shenanigans and a flexible roster of faces who challenge the need for having a lead character at all. Fascinating.


  • Sunday, January 01, 2012

    Things I understand about Things I Don’t Understand

  • After surviving an ‘experiment’ in suicide, twenty-something Violet Kubelick (Molly Ryman, inset) wanders around an emotional cul-de-sac. Her minimum wage gig at a bookstore unleashes an antisocial streak, turning her into a salesperson with no desire to make any sales. She shares an apartment in Brooklyn with an artistic pair who are only slightly less unhinged than she: the performance artist Gabby (Meissa Hampton) and struggling musician Remy (Hugo Dillon). Fiercely intelligent — unlike most movie suicides, she knows to cut her wrists along the length of the vein rather than across — Violet’s grad school thesis, a study of people who’ve had near-death experiences (she refers to them as “near-deathers”) prompts a meeting and eventual friendship with terminal cancer patient Sara (Grace Folsom). All the while, poking at her conscience, a brooding bartender/would-be boyfriend named Parker (Aaron Mathias) and a psychiatrist whose laidback drollery flows through deadpan delivery, Dr. Blankenship (Lisa Eichhorn), gently rattle Violet’s cage, forcing her to examine some ugly personal baggage she’d much rather sweep under the rug.

        This is the framework of Things I Don’t Understand (2011), writer-director David Spaltro’s new comedy about self destruction, loss and cancer. As in his first feature, . . . Around (2008), Spaltro orchestrates a bluesy atmosphere surrounding characters caught momentarily out of sync with everyone and everything else. He treads perilously close to the narcissistic whining of some Woody Allen and Henry Jaglom films, out on that dicey plateau where underlined confusion collides with the protracted adolescence of the privileged and their sundry insecurities. Spaltro’s dialog, however, is mostly genuine and believable, his characters true-to-life creations trudging the rocky urban streets to some kind of epiphany. For what it’s worth, Jaglom has never made a film as coherent, enlightened or as funny as this.

  • 215006aa.jpg
    Above: David Spaltro and Molly Ryman go over a scene; click to enlarge. “Sometimes an actor and director become working soul mates,” says the director, “and they choose to collaborate on multiple films. This is somewhat of a mysterious phenomenon. It is hard to say what exactly makes the actor/director relationship ‘pop.’ They inspire each other. They trust each other. They just ‘get’ each other. Whatever it is, it’s fascinating.”

        I’m sure it’s no coincidence that ‘Violet Kubelick’ will remind some of us of the equally promiscuous and self-destructive Miss Kubelik played by Shirley MacLaine in Billy Wilder’s The Apartment (1960). With her pricey coiffure, meticulous makeup, tasteful wardrobe, trendy wit and elevated IQ, Ryman’s Violet appears to have her act together. At first it’s difficult to grant her any sympathy — isn’t she too smart, too pretty, too cool? She contradicts the common gloomy image of a suicide, as Spaltro’s screenplay wisely recognizes the superficial trappings used by troubled people to camouflage their broken hearts and fatigued, racing minds. And Molly Ryman, whose ‘indie’ career has so far consisted of just a handful of shorts and three barely-seen features, has crafted such a rich, full-bodied character that, if we’ve any compassion at all, our defenses should crumble once Violet’s quiet desperation emerges, usually on mornings after nights of blackout drinking, or being shunned for casual sex by the philosophical mixologist. (Her line, “You just don’t want to fuck me,” slaps the ear with the anguished melancholy of someone who knows rejection all too well.)

        Seasoned with enough characters to fill a good novel, the script challenges its cast and director to overcome the dozens of limitations facing the (very) independent production. Not without its technical gaffes (the audio dips in a couple of spots) and minor flaws, Things I Don’t Understand occasionally lapses during its final act by trying to tie up a few too many loose subplots. (The story of the bartender and his wife, for example, holds enough of a plot for its own movie.) Regardless, everyone works diligently on cramped sets and isolated exteriors — where Spaltro and cinematographer Gus Sacks guide the camera softly and thoughtfully, never obtrusively — to mine the human condition, and are rewarded by an ensemble of mostly unknown actors evidently willing to go the distance.

        This speaks volumes for the talent, charisma and passion of the director, who, at the very least, holds an innate gift for casting. Grace Folsom transforms the cancer patient Sara into a fount of inner beauty and peace prevailing over her disease, evolving into a perfect counterpoint and friend to Violet. Supplying a touch of broad comedy relief, Meissa Hampton and Hugo Dillon appear like a trendy downtown couple ready for their own sitcom, the latter gambling with the film’s low key tone by approaching scenes as if shot out of a cannon. Give him props, however, for delivering the line “This vagina’s got balls!” with unyielding conviction. Last but certainly not least, Spaltro pulls a casting coup with Lisa Eichhorn as the psychiatrist. She had prominent roles in John Schlesinger’s Yanks and James Ivory’s The Europeans (both 1979), while readers of this blog may remember her best as the woozy Maureen ‘Mo’ Cutter in Ivan Passer’s Cutter’s Way (1981). Her Dr. Blankenship in Things I Don’t Understand comes off as guarded and steely-eyed but far from humorless, a sense of empathetic irony quietly resonating in her restrained expressions. Combined, they make the would-be suicide’s recovery story palpable and strangely appealing, tucked away into a private corner of Brooklyn that’s bursting with life.


  • Visit the Official Site
  • Visit the Facebook Page